On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 16:09 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
I'll make the agreed changes by next Wed/Thurs.
I am actively working on this now, after some delays because of other
calls on my time. The suggested changes have needed more rework than I
estimated, touching most lines of the patch, but I
Simon Riggs wrote:
3. Should the WALWriter also do the wal_buffers half-full write at the
start of XLogInsert() ?
That should go away entirely; to me the main point of the separate
wal-writer process is to take over responsibility for not letting too
many dirty wal buffers
Simon Riggs wrote:
That should go away entirely; to me the main point of the separate
wal-writer process is to take over responsibility for not letting too
many dirty wal buffers accumulate.
Yes
I'll make the agreed changes by next Wed/Thurs.
I have seen no patch yet with the
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 15:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
transaction_guarantee.v11.patch
Thanks for the review.
I can't help feeling that this is enormously overcomplicated.
I agree with all but one of your comments, see below.
The DFC in particular seems
