On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 08:31 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 13:21 +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
regression=# SELECT c.relname, m.relblocknumber, m.blockfreebytes
FROM pg_freespacemap m INNER JOIN pg_class c
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 05:05:25PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
3. Helping Readahead efficiency: Currently blocks are allocated one at a
time. If many tables are extending at the same time, the blocks from
multiple tables will be intermixed together on the disk. Reading the
data back takes more
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are a few issues with current FSM implementation, IMHO, discussing
as usual the very highest end of performance:
Do you have any evidence that the FSM is actually a source of
performance issues, or is this all hypothetical?
