Bruce Momjian wrote:
Atsushi Ogawa wrote:
I propose the following specification:
regexp_replace(source text, pattern text, replacement text, [flags
text])
returns text
The flags can use the following values:
g: global (replace all)
i: ignore case
When the flags is not
Atsushi Ogawa wrote:
I think that it is good to specify the flags by one character as well
as Perl.
I propose the following specification:
regexp_replace(source text, pattern text, replacement text, [flags text])
returns text
The flags can use the following values:
g: global (replace
Tom Flavel wrote:
On 08/06/2005 21:57:29, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
surely somthing like
foo_replace (source text, pattern text, replacement text, flags
text)
returns text
would fit the bill. OK, it reflects my Perl prejudices, but that
looks more
David Fetter wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:27:28PM +0900, Atsushi Ogawa wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
Ogawa-san,
I think that this would be a case for function overloading:
function regexp_replace(
string text, pattern text, replacement text
) RETURNS TEXT; /* First
On K, 2005-06-08 at 21:32 +0900, Atsushi Ogawa wrote:
How about changing the function name of each usage?
regexp_replace:replace first
regexp_replace_all:replace all
regexp_ic_replace: replace first and case insensitive
regexp_ic_replace_all: replace all and case
Atsushi Ogawa said:
How about changing the function name of each usage?
regexp_replace:replace first
regexp_replace_all:replace all
regexp_ic_replace: replace first and case insensitive
regexp_ic_replace_all: replace all and case insensitive
That's just horrible. The
Robert Treat wrote:
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 10:57, David Fetter wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:27:28PM +0900, Atsushi Ogawa wrote:
My idea is opposite. I think that the regexp_replace() should make
replace all a default. Because the replace() of pgsql replaces all
string, and
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 10:57, David Fetter wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:27:28PM +0900, Atsushi Ogawa wrote:
My idea is opposite. I think that the regexp_replace() should make
replace all a default. Because the replace() of pgsql replaces all
string, and regexp_replace() of oracle10g
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Atsushi Ogawa said:
How about changing the function name of each usage?
regexp_replace:replace first
regexp_replace_all:replace all
regexp_ic_replace: replace first and case insensitive
regexp_ic_replace_all: replace all and case insensitive
On 08/06/2005 21:57:29, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Atsushi Ogawa said:
How about changing the function name of each usage?
regexp_replace:replace first
regexp_replace_all:replace all
regexp_ic_replace: replace first and case insensitive
David Fetter wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:35:56AM +0900, a_ogawa wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
We don't yet have this functionality, as the patch allows for
using second and later regex matches () in the replacement
pattern.
The function is misnamed. It should be called
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:27:28PM +0900, Atsushi Ogawa wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:35:56AM +0900, a_ogawa wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
We don't yet have this functionality, as the patch allows for
using second and later regex matches () in the replacement
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 12:02:18PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Patch removed because we already have this functionality.
We don't yet have this functionality, as the patch allows for using
second and later regex matches () in the replacement pattern.
The function is misnamed. It should be
David Fetter wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 12:02:18PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Patch removed because we already have this functionality.
We don't yet have this functionality, as the patch allows for using
second and later regex matches () in the replacement pattern.
The function
Bruce Momjian wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 12:02:18PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Patch removed because we already have this functionality.
We don't yet have this functionality, as the patch allows for using
second and later regex matches () in the replacement
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:35:56AM +0900, a_ogawa wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 12:02:18PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Patch removed because we already have this functionality.
We don't yet have this functionality, as the patch allows
16 matches
Mail list logo
