On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 05:24:06PM -0700, Brad Davis wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 06:43:52PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Since I didn't actually tell you that I've made a context diff
for you, and it's attached. I'll let someone with more FBSD-fu
Hi,
I have a patch that improves the documentation for FreeBSD Kernel Tuning:
- Show a # prompt instead of $ to indicate a root shell is needed
- Remove the -w flag to sysctl since it is not needed anymore and just silently
ignored
- Encourage the user to set the read-only sysctls in
On 01/03/2012 04:49 PM, Brad Davis wrote:
Hi,
I have a patch that improves the documentation for FreeBSD Kernel Tuning:
- Show a # prompt instead of $ to indicate a root shell is needed
- Remove the -w flag to sysctl since it is not needed anymore and just silently
ignored
- Encourage the
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 05:02:57PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 01/03/2012 04:49 PM, Brad Davis wrote:
Hi,
I have a patch that improves the documentation for FreeBSD Kernel Tuning:
- Show a # prompt instead of $ to indicate a root shell is needed
- Remove the -w flag to sysctl
On 01/03/2012 06:15 PM, Brad Davis wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 05:02:57PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 01/03/2012 04:49 PM, Brad Davis wrote:
Hi,
I have a patch that improves the documentation for FreeBSD Kernel Tuning:
- Show a # prompt instead of $ to indicate a root shell is
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Since I didn't actually tell you that I've made a context diff
for you, and it's attached. I'll let someone with more FBSD-fu than me
actually comment on it.
I have no FBSD-fu whatever, but the question this patch raises in my
mind is whether
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 06:43:52PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Since I didn't actually tell you that I've made a context diff
for you, and it's attached. I'll let someone with more FBSD-fu than me
actually comment on it.
I have no FBSD-fu whatever,
