On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:08:20 -0500 Tom Lane wrote:
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum adsm...@wars-nicht.de writes:
On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:19:48 -0500 Tom Lane wrote:
If we're going to do this, shouldn't it happen uniformly for *all*
ACL displays in describe.c?
Makes sense, imho.
Done.
Oh,
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum adsm...@wars-nicht.de writes:
On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:19:48 -0500 Tom Lane wrote:
If we're going to do this, shouldn't it happen uniformly for *all*
ACL displays in describe.c?
Makes sense, imho.
Done.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via
On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:19:48 -0500 Tom Lane wrote:
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum adsm...@wars-nicht.de writes:
the march 2008 commitfest added a patch[1] with extended information for
\l+. The may 2008 commitfest added a patch[2] which reformats the
permission output in \z. I like the new output
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum adsm...@wars-nicht.de writes:
the march 2008 commitfest added a patch[1] with extended information for
\l+. The may 2008 commitfest added a patch[2] which reformats the
permission output in \z. I like the new output in \z, but the \l+
output is still missing this
Hello,
the march 2008 commitfest added a patch[1] with extended information for
\l+. The may 2008 commitfest added a patch[2] which reformats the
permission output in \z. I like the new output in \z, but the \l+
output is still missing this feature. The attached patch solves this
problem.