Re: [HACKERS] [sqlsmith] Short reads in hash indexes

2016-12-30 Thread Amit Kapila
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 3:45 AM, Andreas Seltenreich wrote: > Amit Kapila writes: > >> Can you please try with the patch posted on hash index thread [1] to >> see if you can reproduce any of these problems? >> >> [1] - >>

Re: [HACKERS] [sqlsmith] Short reads in hash indexes

2016-12-29 Thread Andreas Seltenreich
Amit Kapila writes: > Can you please try with the patch posted on hash index thread [1] to > see if you can reproduce any of these problems? > > [1] - > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1Kf6tOY0oVz_SEdngiNFkeXrA3xUSDPPORQvsWVPdKqnA%40mail.gmail.com I'm no longer seeing the failed

Re: [HACKERS] [sqlsmith] Short reads in hash indexes

2016-12-10 Thread Amit Kapila
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 2:38 AM, Andreas Seltenreich wrote: > Andreas Seltenreich writes: > >> Amit Kapila writes: >> >>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Andreas Seltenreich >>> wrote: Amit Kapila writes: > [2. text/x-diff;

Re: [HACKERS] [sqlsmith] Short reads in hash indexes

2016-12-07 Thread Amit Kapila
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 2:38 AM, Andreas Seltenreich wrote: > Andreas Seltenreich writes: > >> Amit Kapila writes: >> >>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Andreas Seltenreich >>> wrote: Amit Kapila writes: > [2. text/x-diff;

Re: [HACKERS] [sqlsmith] Short reads in hash indexes

2016-12-07 Thread Andreas Seltenreich
Andreas Seltenreich writes: > Amit Kapila writes: > >> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Andreas Seltenreich >> wrote: >>> Amit Kapila writes: >>> [2. text/x-diff; fix_hash_bucketsplit_sqlsmith_v1.patch] >>> Ok, I'll do testing with the patch applied. > > Good news: the