> #define HEXVALUE(c) \
> (((c) >= '0' && (c) <= '9') ? ((c) - '0') : \
>(((c) >= 'A' && (c) <= 'F') ? ((c) - 'A' + 10) : \
> ((c) - 'a' + 10)))
>
> 3. The third level would be to get rid of the assumption that letters
> are contiguous, which would probably require making a lo
Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Jason Godden wrote:
>> On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 06:25 am, Markus Bertheau wrote:
>>> +#define HEXVALUE(c) (((c)>='a') ? ((c)-87) : (((c)>='A') ? ((c)-55) :
> ((c)-'0')))
> I haven't looked at the code in question, but assuming the digits ar
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Jason Godden wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 06:25 am, Markus Bertheau wrote:
> > Ð ÐÑÐ, 05.11.2003, Ð 16:25, Tom Lane ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> > > > +#define HEXVALUE(c) (((c)>='a') ? ((c)-87) : (((c)>='A') ? ((c)-55) :
> > > > ((c)-'0')))
> > >
> > > This seems excessively dependent on the assum
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:47:17PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
>
> --On Thursday, November 06, 2003 07:43:07 +1100 Jason Godden
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 06:25 am, Markus Bertheau wrote:
> >>? ???, 05.11.2003, ? 16:25, Tom Lane ?:
> >>> > +#define HEXVALUE(c) (
--On Thursday, November 06, 2003 07:43:07 +1100 Jason Godden
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 06:25 am, Markus Bertheau wrote:
? ???, 05.11.2003, ? 16:25, Tom Lane ?:
> > +#define HEXVALUE(c) (((c)>='a') ? ((c)-87) : (((c)>='A') ? ((c)-55)
> > : ((c)-'0')))
>
> This seems exces
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 06:25 am, Markus Bertheau wrote:
> Ð ÐÑÐ, 05.11.2003, Ð 16:25, Tom Lane ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> > > +#define HEXVALUE(c) (((c)>='a') ? ((c)-87) : (((c)>='A') ? ((c)-55) :
> > > ((c)-'0')))
> >
> > This seems excessively dependent on the assumption that the character
> > set is ASCII. Why have
Ð ÐÑÐ, 05.11.2003, Ð 16:25, Tom Lane ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> > +#define HEXVALUE(c) (((c)>='a') ? ((c)-87) : (((c)>='A') ? ((c)-55) : ((c)-'0')))
>
> This seems excessively dependent on the assumption that the character
> set is ASCII. Why have you hard-coded numeric equivalents into this
> macro?
What not AS
Jason Godden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is my first patch for PostgreSQL against the 7.5devel cvs (please
> advise if this is the wrong place to post patches).
pgsql-patches in future, please.
> +#define HEXVALUE(c) (((c)>='a') ? ((c)-87) : (((c)>='A') ? ((c)-55) : ((c)-'0')))
This seems
This is my first patch for PostgreSQL against the 7.5devel cvs (please advise if this is the wrong place to post patches). This patch simply enables the \xDD (or \XDD) hexadecimal import in the copy command (im starting with the simple stuff first). I did notice that there may be a need to issue
Jason Godden writes:
> This is my first patch for PostgreSQL against the 7.5devel cvs (please advise if
> this is the wrong place to post patches). This patch simply enables the \xDD (or
> \XDD) hexadecimal import in the copy command (im starting with the simple stuff
> first). I did notice t
Hi all,
This is my first patch for PostgreSQL against the 7.5devel cvs (please advise if this
is the wrong place to post patches). This patch simply enables the \xDD (or \XDD)
hexadecimal import in the copy command (im starting with the simple stuff first). I
did notice that there may be a ne
11 matches
Mail list logo
