Re: [HACKERS] -HEAD build failure on OpenBSD 3.6-current/Sparc64

2004-10-05 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Tom Lane wrote: Stefan Kaltenbrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: this one got caught by the testfarm as well - it looks like the openbsd-specific makefile is missing a -fPIC for the Sparc platform(I would assume that at least NetBSD/sparc is affected too but I don't have access to such a system

Re: [HACKERS] -HEAD build failure on OpenBSD 3.6-current/Sparc64

2004-10-05 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Tom Lane wrote: Stefan Kaltenbrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: Why did you remove -DPIC ? uhm partly because I sent the wrong patch and partly because I didn't understood what that to do anyway(in the !Sparc case). The only place I can find on my machine where defining PIC seems

[HACKERS] -HEAD build failure on OpenBSD 3.6-current/Sparc64 +patch

2004-10-04 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
this one got caught by the testfarm as well - it looks like the openbsd-specific makefile is missing a -fPIC for the Sparc platform(I would assume that at least NetBSD/sparc is affected too but I don't have access to such a system to test on). And I also think that -shared is now

Re: [HACKERS] -HEAD build failure on OpenBSD 3.6-current/Sparc64 +patch

2004-10-04 Thread Tom Lane
Stefan Kaltenbrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: this one got caught by the testfarm as well - it looks like the openbsd-specific makefile is missing a -fPIC for the Sparc platform(I would assume that at least NetBSD/sparc is affected too but I don't have access to such a system to test on).