On ons, 2011-01-26 at 15:38 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Patch attached.
The coverage directory belongs under Local excludes in root
directory. Version 2.
I have committed a simplified version of this, except the coverage/
directory,
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié ene 26 19:20:52 -0300 2011:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Ick. That's an awful lot of
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié ene 26 19:20:52 -0300 2011:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:44
Building for coverage and running the reports littered my tree with
files which should probably be in .gitignore for just such a
contingency. Patch attached.
-Kevin
*** a/.gitignore
--- b/.gitignore
***
*** 12,17
--- 12,26
*.mo
objfiles.txt
.deps/
+ *.h.gcov
+
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Patch attached.
The coverage directory belongs under Local excludes in root
directory. Version 2.
-Kevin
*** a/.gitignore
--- b/.gitignore
***
*** 12,19
--- 12,28
*.mo
objfiles.txt
.deps/
+ *.h.gcov
+ *.c.gcov
+
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes:
Building for coverage and running the reports littered my tree with
files which should probably be in .gitignore for just such a
contingency. Patch attached.
Ick. That's an awful lot of stuff to have global ignores for.
Perhaps we should
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov writes:
Building for coverage and running the reports littered my tree with
files which should probably be in .gitignore for just such a
contingency. Patch attached.
Ick. That's
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Ick. That's an awful lot of stuff to have global ignores for.
The coverage directory ignore seems a little icky, but the rest
seems unlikely to pick up anything incidental.
Tying
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I'm still unexcited about the thesis that we should auto-ignore
the results of any random tool somebody wants to run in their
source tree.
Hos about just the tools supported by our documentation, configure
file and make file?
-Kevin
--
Sent via
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié ene 26 19:20:52 -0300 2011:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Ick. That's an awful lot of stuff to have global ignores for.
The coverage directory ignore seems a little
10 matches
Mail list logo
