Re: [HACKERS] 7.1 startup recovery failure

2001-05-01 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010430 22:10] wrote: > Corrupted or not, after a crash take a snapshot of the data tree > before firing it back up again. Doesn't take that much time > (especially with a netapp filer) and it allows for a virtually > unlimited number of attempts to solve the trou

Re: [HACKERS] 7.1 startup recovery failure

2001-04-30 Thread Rod Taylor
t Inc. - Original Message - From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Vadim Mikheev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "pgsql-hackers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 11:02 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.1 startup recovery failure > Va

Re: [HACKERS] 7.1 startup recovery failure

2001-04-30 Thread Hiroshi Inoue
Vadim Mikheev wrote: > > > There's a report of startup recovery failure in Japan. > > Redo done but ... > > Unfortunately I have no time today. > > Please ask to start up with wal_debug = 1... > Isn't it very difficult for dbas to leave the corrupted database as it is ? ISTM we could hardly exp

Re: [HACKERS] 7.1 startup recovery failure

2001-04-29 Thread Hiroshi Inoue
"Mikheev, Vadim" wrote: > > > > There's a report of startup recovery failure in Japan. > > > > > >> DEBUG: redo done at (1, 3923880100) > > >> FATAL 2: XLogFlush: request is not satisfied > > >> postmaster: Startup proc 4228 exited with status 512 - abort > > > > Is this person using 7.1 release

RE: [HACKERS] 7.1 startup recovery failure

2001-04-27 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
> > There's a report of startup recovery failure in Japan. > > > >> DEBUG: redo done at (1, 3923880100) > >> FATAL 2: XLogFlush: request is not satisfied > >> postmaster: Startup proc 4228 exited with status 512 - abort > > Is this person using 7.1 release, or a beta/RC version? That looks > j

Re: [HACKERS] 7.1 startup recovery failure

2001-04-27 Thread Tom Lane
Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There's a report of startup recovery failure in Japan. > >> DEBUG: redo done at (1, 3923880100) >> FATAL 2: XLogFlush: request is not satisfied >> postmaster: Startup proc 4228 exited with status 512 - abort Is this person using 7.1 release, or a beta

Re: [HACKERS] 7.1 startup recovery failure

2001-04-26 Thread Vadim Mikheev
> There's a report of startup recovery failure in Japan. > Redo done but ... > Unfortunately I have no time today. Please ask to start up with wal_debug = 1... Vadim ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unreg

[HACKERS] 7.1 startup recovery failure

2001-04-26 Thread Hiroshi Inoue
Hi, There's a report of startup recovery failure in Japan. Redo done but ... Unfortunately I have no time today. regards, Hiroshi Inoue KAMI wrote: > > > DEBUG: database system shutdown was interrupted at 2001-04-26 22:15:00 JST > DEBUG: CheckPoint record at (1, 3923829232) > DEBUG: Redo rec