Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The libpq SSL memory leak reported on -bugs would be good to fix.
We don't know yet if that's our bug or not.
BTW, is there a particular reason we're pushing out 7.4.1 so soon?
ISTM there wouldn't be
Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A bug in the information schema concerning the bit types must be
fixed.
Does anyone have a patch for this?
I suppose not, but it's being worked on.
What's the bug exactly? Is it worth delaying the release for? Given
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To accomodate ppls travel scheduales, we are going to move the 7.4.1
release up to Monday, *unless* there is a report before then about
something that needs to be fixed first
The libpq SSL memory leak reported on -bugs would be good to fix.
BTW, is
Neil Conway wrote:
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To accomodate ppls travel scheduales, we are going to move the 7.4.1
release up to Monday, *unless* there is a report before then about
something that needs to be fixed first
The libpq SSL memory leak reported on -bugs would
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The libpq SSL memory leak reported on -bugs would be good to fix.
We don't know yet if that's our bug or not.
BTW, is there a particular reason we're pushing out 7.4.1 so soon?
ISTM there wouldn't be anything wrong with waiting a week or two...
Well, we
Tom Lane wrote:
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The libpq SSL memory leak reported on -bugs would be good to fix.
We don't know yet if that's our bug or not.
BTW, is there a particular reason we're pushing out 7.4.1 so soon?
ISTM there wouldn't be anything wrong with waiting a
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So we have SSL, information schema (bit), and autovacuum. The last one
is an easy fix, not sure on the others.
I thought you already applied those autovacuum patches? Is there
something else pending for it?
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So we have SSL, information schema (bit), and autovacuum. The last one
is an easy fix, not sure on the others.
I thought you already applied those autovacuum patches? Is there
something else pending for it?
I am still reading
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am still reading email from yesterday, but this is a new patch in the
past 2 days. The problem is that time differences were overflowing int
values if the vacuum took a long time, or something like that. The fix
is to cast one to long long.
That's
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am still reading email from yesterday, but this is a new patch in the
past 2 days. The problem is that time differences were overflowing int
values if the vacuum took a long time, or something like that. The fix
is to cast one to
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
That's no fix --- it will break the code on compilers without long long.
Here are the emails describing the problem. Seems they should see how
we do time differences in the backend as an example.
Now that I look at it, the code is
To accomodate ppls travel scheduales, we are going to move the 7.4.1
release up to Monday, *unless* there is a report before then about
something that needs to be fixed first ... we know of nothing outstanding
right now ...
This means it will be tag'd/bundled on Sunday ...
Marc G.
--On Friday, December 05, 2003 12:47:40 -0400 Marc G. Fournier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To accomodate ppls travel scheduales, we are going to move the 7.4.1
release up to Monday, *unless* there is a report before then about
something that needs to be fixed first ... we know of nothing
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Marc G. Fournier writes:
To accomodate ppls travel scheduales, we are going to move the 7.4.1
release up to Monday, *unless* there is a report before then about
something that needs to be fixed first ... we know of nothing outstanding
right
Marc G. Fournier writes:
To accomodate ppls travel scheduales, we are going to move the 7.4.1
release up to Monday, *unless* there is a report before then about
something that needs to be fixed first ... we know of nothing outstanding
right now ...
A bug in the information schema concerning
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
To accomodate ppls travel scheduales, we are going to move the 7.4.1
release up to Monday, *unless* there is a report before then about
something that needs to be fixed first ... we know of nothing outstanding
right now ...
This means it will be tag'd/bundled on Sunday ...
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
A bug in the information schema concerning the bit types must be
fixed.
Does anyone have a patch for this?
I suppose not, but it's being worked on.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
A bug in the information schema concerning the bit types must be
fixed.
Does anyone have a patch for this?
I suppose not, but it's being worked on.
Is that the one that Joe just mentioned workign on? about BYTEA?
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I suppose not, but it's being worked on.
Is that the one that Joe just mentioned workign on? about BYTEA?
I don't think so.
Joe
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A bug in the information schema concerning the bit types must be
fixed.
Does anyone have a patch for this?
I suppose not, but it's being worked on.
What's the bug exactly? Is it worth delaying the release for? Given
that Bruce is out of town now
20 matches
Mail list logo
