Re: [HACKERS] 7.4RC1 tag'd, branched and bundled ...

2003-11-05 Thread scott.marlowe
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Gaetano Mendola wrote: I agree in general with you for these general arguments, but here we are talking about to introduce a sleep ( removable by guc ) or not! What about the hash refactoring introduced with 7.4? Are you going to discourage people to use the hash?

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4RC1 tag'd, branched and bundled ...

2003-11-04 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Marc G. Fournier writes: As for beta, I used 'beta#' throughout this release cycle, and will use RC# for the release candidate(s) ... Actually, this messes up the lexicographical ordering of the release tarballs in directory listings, upgrade schemes, etc., so please don't do this again. --

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4RC1 tag'd, branched and bundled ...

2003-11-04 Thread Gaetano Mendola
Tom Lane wrote: Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Gaetano Mendola wrote: Is in the last Tom's patch about Vacuum sleep between pages ? that won't be in v7.4, to the best of my knowledge ... Definitely not. It's a very experimental patch. I not agree, is an

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4RC1 tag'd, branched and bundled ...

2003-11-04 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 05:35:42PM +0100, Gaetano Mendola wrote: I agree in general with you for these general arguments, but here we are talking about to introduce a sleep ( removable by guc ) or not! What about the hash refactoring introduced with 7.4? Are you going to discourage people

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4RC1 tag'd, branched and bundled ...

2003-11-04 Thread Gaetano Mendola
Alvaro Herrera wrote: On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 05:35:42PM +0100, Gaetano Mendola wrote: I agree in general with you for these general arguments, but here we are talking about to introduce a sleep ( removable by guc ) or not! What about the hash refactoring introduced with 7.4? Are you going to

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4RC1 tag'd, branched and bundled ...

2003-11-03 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Marc G. Fournier writes: As Tom announced on Friday, Release Candidate 1 has now been tag'd and bundled ... Can you please sometime decide once and for all how you're going to name the tarballs and then communicate that information to the group? Is it rc1 or RC1, beta2 or b2? It's not that

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4RC1 tag'd, branched and bundled ...

2003-11-03 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Marc G. Fournier writes: As Tom announced on Friday, Release Candidate 1 has now been tag'd and bundled ... Can you please sometime decide once and for all how you're going to name the tarballs and then communicate that information to the

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4RC1 tag'd, branched and bundled ...

2003-11-03 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Marc G. Fournier writes: Why does it scare you? *raised eyebrow* Because release-making should be a predictable process. But if every other release brings a new surprise in the naming scheme, it's not. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4RC1 tag'd, branched and bundled ...

2003-11-03 Thread Gaetano Mendola
Marc G. Fournier wrote: As Tom announced on Friday, Release Candidate 1 has now been tag'd and bundled ... please test to confirm that nothing seems off with this build Is in the last Tom's patch about Vacuum sleep between pages ? Regards Gaetano Mendola ---(end of

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4RC1 tag'd, branched and bundled ...

2003-11-03 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Gaetano Mendola wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: As Tom announced on Friday, Release Candidate 1 has now been tag'd and bundled ... please test to confirm that nothing seems off with this build Is in the last Tom's patch about Vacuum sleep between pages ? that won't

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4RC1 tag'd, branched and bundled ...

2003-11-03 Thread Tom Lane
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Gaetano Mendola wrote: Is in the last Tom's patch about Vacuum sleep between pages ? that won't be in v7.4, to the best of my knowledge ... Definitely not. It's a very experimental patch. regards, tom