Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster

2013-10-21 Thread Jeff Janes
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > MauMau escribió: > > >>From: "Alvaro Herrera" > > >>>Can you please send a fixup patch to what's already committed? > > >> > > >>OK, I'll send a patch against HEAD, which will be a few lines. Am I > > >>understanding the meaning of "fixup p

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster

2013-10-05 Thread Alvaro Herrera
MauMau escribió: > >>From: "Alvaro Herrera" > >>>Can you please send a fixup patch to what's already committed? > >> > >>OK, I'll send a patch against HEAD, which will be a few lines. Am I > >>understanding the meaning of "fixup patch"? > > > >Yep, thanks. > > Please use the attached patch. Tha

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster

2013-10-04 Thread MauMau
From: "Alvaro Herrera" >Can you please send a fixup patch to what's already committed? OK, I'll send a patch against HEAD, which will be a few lines. Am I understanding the meaning of "fixup patch"? Yep, thanks. Please use the attached patch. Thanks. Regards MauMau reliable_immediate_sh

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster

2013-10-03 Thread Alvaro Herrera
MauMau escribió: > From: "Alvaro Herrera" > >Can you please send a fixup patch to what's already committed? > > OK, I'll send a patch against HEAD, which will be a few lines. Am I > understanding the meaning of "fixup patch"? Yep, thanks. -- Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadran

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster

2013-10-03 Thread MauMau
From: "Alvaro Herrera" Can you please send a fixup patch to what's already committed? OK, I'll send a patch against HEAD, which will be a few lines. Am I understanding the meaning of "fixup patch"? Regards MauMau -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To m

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster

2013-10-01 Thread Alvaro Herrera
MauMau escribió: > "AbortStartTime > 0" is also necessary to avoid sending SIGKILL > repeatedly. I sent the attached patch during the original > discussion. The below fragment is relevant: Can you please send a fixup patch to what's already committed? -- Álvaro Herrerahttp://ww

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster

2013-09-13 Thread MauMau
From: "Jeff Janes" -- I've implemented the Min to Max change and did some more testing. Now I have a different but related problem (which I also saw before, but less often than the select() one). The 5 second clock doesn't get turned off. So afte

[HACKERS] 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster

2013-09-12 Thread Jeff Janes
On Wednesday, September 11, 2013, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Noah Misch escribió: > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:18:21PM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote: > > > > I think the problem is here, where there should be a Max rather than a > Min: > > > > > > commit 82233ce7ea42d6ba519aaec63008aff49da6c7af > > > Aut

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster

2013-09-11 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Noah Misch escribió: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:18:21PM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote: > > I think the problem is here, where there should be a Max rather than a Min: > > > > commit 82233ce7ea42d6ba519aaec63008aff49da6c7af > > Author: Alvaro Herrera > > Date: Fri Jun 28 17:20:53 2013 -0400 > > >

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster

2013-09-11 Thread Noah Misch
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:18:21PM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote: > I've been getting some failures after an immediate shutdown or crash, > during severe IO stress, with the message: > > LOG: XX000: select() failed in postmaster: Invalid argument > LOCATION: ServerLoop, postmaster.c:1560 > > It is tr

[HACKERS] 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster

2013-09-10 Thread Jeff Janes
I've been getting some failures after an immediate shutdown or crash, during severe IO stress, with the message: LOG: XX000: select() failed in postmaster: Invalid argument LOCATION: ServerLoop, postmaster.c:1560 It is trying to sleep for -1 seconds. I think the problem is here, where there sh