Re: [HACKERS] A question about the psql \copy command

2013-09-10 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 09:45:17PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote: Through the work on the patch [1], I had a question about the psql \copy command. We are permitted 1) but not permitted 2): 1) \copy foo from stdin ; 2) \copy foo from stdin; Is this intentional? I think it would be better to

Re: [HACKERS] A question about the psql \copy command

2013-02-14 Thread Amit Kapila
On Thursday, February 07, 2013 6:15 PM Etsuro Fujita wrote: Through the work on the patch [1], I had a question about the psql \copy command. We are permitted 1) but not permitted 2): 1) \copy foo from stdin ; 2) \copy foo from stdin; Is this intentional? I think it would be better to allow

Re: [HACKERS] A question about the psql \copy command

2013-02-10 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote: Through the work on the patch [1], I had a question about the psql \copy command. We are permitted 1) but not permitted 2): 1) \copy foo from stdin ; 2) \copy foo from stdin; Is this intentional? I think it

[HACKERS] A question about the psql \copy command

2013-02-07 Thread Etsuro Fujita
Through the work on the patch [1], I had a question about the psql \copy command. We are permitted 1) but not permitted 2): 1) \copy foo from stdin ; 2) \copy foo from stdin; Is this intentional? I think it would be better to allow for 2). Attached is a patch. Thanks, Best regards, Etsuro