On 09/02/2010 23:37, Greg Smith wrote:
[snip]
So the logical choice is plain LGPL3. I am open to motivated
suggestions about other
licenses but I'll ignore such crap as BSD is more open than LGPL.
I agree with your general logic and while I can't speak for everyone, I
would be happy
First of all let me say that from such incredible hackers as the
PostgreSQL people I'd have expected the ability to find my email address
and maybe keep me or (even better) the psycopg mailing list in CC. That
would have avoided a lot of confusion both on the license and the status
of psycopg2. If
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Federico Di Gregorio f...@initd.org wrote:
Btw, I was
at FOSDEM as probably other PostgreSQL people were and all this could
have been discussed while drinking a couple of beers if only someone
cared to contact me.
Hmm, I resent that. As one of the people at
On 09/02/2010 15:22, Dave Page wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Federico Di Gregorio f...@initd.org wrote:
Btw, I was
at FOSDEM as probably other PostgreSQL people were and all this could
have been discussed while drinking a couple of beers if only someone
cared to contact me.
Hmm, I
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 15:28, Federico Di Gregorio f...@initd.org wrote:
On 09/02/2010 15:22, Dave Page wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Federico Di Gregorio f...@initd.org wrote:
Btw, I was
at FOSDEM as probably other PostgreSQL people were and all this could
have been discussed while
[Resending; I accidentally failed to copy the list.]
Federico Di Gregorio f...@initd.org wrote:
the logical choice is plain LGPL3. I am open to motivated
suggestions about other licenses but I'll ignore such crap as BSD
is more open than LGPL.
Well, I don't know about more open, but I find
Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
First of all let me say that from such incredible hackers as the
PostgreSQL people I'd have expected the ability to find my email address
and maybe keep me or (even better) the psycopg mailing list in CC. That
would have avoided a lot of confusion both on the license