$ createdb -U postgres hoge
$ psql -d hoge -U postgres
hoge=# create table test (col text);
hoge=# insert into test select repeat(chr(code),1) from
generate_series(1,10) code;
Execute dropdb -k while the client is inserting many tuples into database
$ dropdb -k hoge
2014-01-29 23:10:49
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:09 AM, salah jubeh s_ju...@yahoo.com wrote:
$ createdb -U postgres hoge
$ psql -d hoge -U postgres
hoge=# create table test (col text);
hoge=# insert into test select repeat(chr(code),1) from
generate_series(1,10) code;
Execute dropdb -k while the client is
Hello Robert,
but the scripts are intended to be thin wrappers around
the underlying database functionality, and I think this is straying
too far from that core mission.
I think, you have a good point here.
Regards
On Friday, January 31, 2014 4:47 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Robert,
I'm not particularly in favor of implementing this as client-side
functionality, because then it's only available to people who use that
particular client. Simon Riggs proposed a server-side option to the
DROP DATABASE command some time ago, and I think that might be the way
to
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:01 PM, salah jubeh s_ju...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello Sawada,
- This patch is not patched to master branch
Sorry, My mistake
//new connections are not allowed
Corrected.
I hope now the patch in better state, if somthing left, I will be glad to
fix it
Regards
On
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:56 AM, salah jubeh s_ju...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm not particularly in favor of implementing this as client-side
functionality, because then it's only available to people who use that
particular client. Simon Riggs proposed a server-side option to the
DROP DATABASE command
Hello Sawada,
- This patch is not patched to master branch
Sorry, My mistake
//new connections are not allowed
Corrected.
I hope now the patch in better state, if somthing left, I will be glad to fix
it
Regards
On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 4:17 AM, Sawada Masahiko sawada.m...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:01 AM, salah jubeh s_ju...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello Sawada,
- This patch is not patched to master branch
Sorry, My mistake
//new connections are not allowed
Corrected.
I hope now the patch in better state, if somthing left, I will be glad to
fix it
Regards
I'm not
On 2014年1月17日 0:56, salah jubeh s_ju...@yahoo.com wrote:
If the user owns objects, that will prevent this from working also. I
have the feeling that adding DROP OWNED BY and/or REASSIGNED OWNED BY
calls to this utility would be a bit excessive, but who knows.
Please find attached the first
If the user owns objects, that will prevent this from working also. I
have the feeling that adding DROP OWNED BY and/or REASSIGNED OWNED BY
calls to this utility would be a bit excessive, but who knows.
Please find attached the first attempt to drop drop the client connections.
I have added an
Hello,
I think adding a force option to dropdb is usefull for many purposes, mainly;
scripting. For example, in a test enviroment, I restore a daily backup of
production databases. The newly created databases are used as templates for
development and also for reading, thus replacing them is
salah jubeh wrote:
For the sake of completeness:
1. I think also, I need also to temporary disallow conecting to the database,
is that right?
2. Is there other factors can hinder dropping database?
If the user owns objects, that will prevent this from working also. I
have the feeling that
12 matches
Mail list logo
