On 2014-07-02 08:55:05 +, Rajeev rastogi wrote:
> Also can we change the description of function "pg_buffercache_pages" to
> include pinning_backend also in the description.
I'm not sure what you mean here - I've adjusted the docs to include the
column? Or do you mean that it errorneously was
On 23 June 2014 15:22, Andres Freund Wrote:
> > This may be harmless but pinning_backends should be defined as int4
> > rather than int8 because BufferDesc->refcount is just defined as
> > unsigned and it's converted to Datum by Int32GetDatum().
>
> Well, in theory a uint32 can't generally be co
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-06-23 18:44:24 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Andres Freund
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > The last week I twice had the need to see how many backends had some
>> > buffers pinned. Once during developmen
On 2014-06-23 18:44:24 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The last week I twice had the need to see how many backends had some
> > buffers pinned. Once during development and once while analyzing a stuck
> > vacuum (waiting for a clean
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The last week I twice had the need to see how many backends had some
> buffers pinned. Once during development and once while analyzing a stuck
> vacuum (waiting for a cleanup lock).
> I'd like to add a column to pg_buffercache exposi
Hi,
The last week I twice had the need to see how many backends had some
buffers pinned. Once during development and once while analyzing a stuck
vacuum (waiting for a cleanup lock).
I'd like to add a column to pg_buffercache exposing that. The name I've
come up with is 'pinning_backends' to refle
