Re: [HACKERS] Adding regexp_match() function

This seems like it'd be useful. Anyone else have thoughts on it? On May 31, 2010, at 4:09 AM, Daniele Varrazzo wrote: Hello, I'd like to contribute a regexp_match() function as discussed in bug #5469 [1] The aim is to overcome the limitation outlined in the thread above

Re: [HACKERS] Adding regexp_match() function

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:25 AM, Jim Nasby j...@nasby.net wrote: This seems like it'd be useful. Anyone else have thoughts on it? +1. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)

[HACKERS] Adding regexp_match() function

Hello, I'd like to contribute a regexp_match() function as discussed in bug #5469 [1] The aim is to overcome the limitation outlined in the thread above http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-05/msg00227.php. PostgreSQL currently offers the function regexp_matches(), a SRF (which, unless