Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1
All: Sounds like the overwhemling consensus is Alpha2 then. Will run with it. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1
On 21 July 2015 at 22:01, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote: My question for Hackers is: should this be Alpha2 or Beta 1? Alpha2 -- Simon Riggshttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ http://www.2ndquadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training Services
Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1
On 2015/07/22 12:40, Noah Misch wrote: I vote for alpha2. Comparing the Open Issues and resolved after 9.5alpha1 sections of https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items, we've not transitioned to a qualitatively different level of API stability. +1 for alpha2. I'd like to propose a patch for the issue Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual, but I need more time ... Best regards, Etsuro Fujita -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote: On 2015/07/22 12:40, Noah Misch wrote: I vote for alpha2. Comparing the Open Issues and resolved after 9.5alpha1 sections of https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items, we've not transitioned to a qualitatively different level of API stability. +1 for alpha2. +1 for alpha2 from me as well. We have made some progress but there is an awful lot of stuff left to get fixed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 02:01:57PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: At the Developer's Meeting, we said we'd be releasing an alpha or beta each month until final 9.5 release. As such, we should be releasing a 9.5 alpha/beta in the first week of August. My question for Hackers is: should this be Alpha2 or Beta 1? I vote for alpha2. Comparing the Open Issues and resolved after 9.5alpha1 sections of https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items, we've not transitioned to a qualitatively different level of API stability. Thanks, nm -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 02:01:57PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: At the Developer's Meeting, we said we'd be releasing an alpha or beta each month until final 9.5 release. As such, we should be releasing a 9.5 alpha/beta in the first week of August. My question for Hackers is: should this be Alpha2 or Beta 1? I vote for alpha2. Comparing the Open Issues and resolved after 9.5alpha1 sections of https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items, we've not transitioned to a qualitatively different level of API stability. Mine goes for alpha2. There are some issues remaining yet that require low-level attention. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1
All: At the Developer's Meeting, we said we'd be releasing an alpha or beta each month until final 9.5 release. As such, we should be releasing a 9.5 alpha/beta in the first week of August. My question for Hackers is: should this be Alpha2 or Beta 1? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1
On 22/07/15 09:01, Josh Berkus wrote: [...] My question for Hackers is: should this be Alpha2 or Beta 1? Yes! :-) (The decision, as to which, I'll leave to the REAL Developers.) More seriously, I expect that the alpha probably generated a lot of useful feedback. Was this actually the case? Cheers, Gavin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote: I vote for alpha2. Comparing the Open Issues and resolved after 9.5alpha1 sections of https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items, we've not transitioned to a qualitatively different level of API stability. I agree. I'd hoped that my bugfixes would get committed in time for what we were going to call Beta 1. Everyone qualified seems to be very busy with other things that are more pressing. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
