Re: [HACKERS] Any more "must fix" issues for 7.4?

2003-11-14 Thread Christof Petig
Bruce Momjian schrieb: Peter Eisentraut wrote: Bruce Momjian writes: Oh, I forgot about that. This leaves datetime.h and decimal.h in /pgsql/include. I don't see how 7.4.1 can fix that because people will not be using initdb. This has nothing to do with initdb. Right. I mean install isn't g

Re: [HACKERS] Any more "must fix" issues for 7.4?

2003-11-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > Oh, I forgot about that. This leaves datetime.h and decimal.h in > > /pgsql/include. I don't see how 7.4.1 can fix that because people will > > not be using initdb. > > This has nothing to do with initdb. Right. I mean install isn't going

Re: [HACKERS] Any more "must fix" issues for 7.4?

2003-11-13 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: > Oh, I forgot about that. This leaves datetime.h and decimal.h in > /pgsql/include. I don't see how 7.4.1 can fix that because people will > not be using initdb. This has nothing to do with initdb. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(en

Re: [HACKERS] Any more "must fix" issues for 7.4?

2003-11-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Tom Lane writes: > > > Barring surprises, we will institute a code freeze in the 7.4 branch > > tonight with an eye to wrapping the release Sunday. Is anyone aware > > of critical loose ends that still need to be dealt with? > > The only thing I had left was the install

Re: [HACKERS] Any more "must fix" issues for 7.4?

2003-11-13 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane writes: > Barring surprises, we will institute a code freeze in the 7.4 branch > tonight with an eye to wrapping the release Sunday. Is anyone aware > of critical loose ends that still need to be dealt with? The only thing I had left was the installation locations for the Informix compa

Re: [HACKERS] Any more "must fix" issues for 7.4?

2003-11-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, November 13, 2003 13:18:31 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The only thing I'm aware of is the setsockopt() issue on OpenServer. We have no proposed patch for that, either, so it will also have to wait for 7.4.1. modulo the unac

Re: [HACKERS] Any more "must fix" issues for 7.4?

2003-11-13 Thread Tom Lane
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The only thing I'm aware of is the setsockopt() issue on OpenServer. We have no proposed patch for that, either, so it will also have to wait for 7.4.1. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)---

Re: [HACKERS] Any more "must fix" issues for 7.4?

2003-11-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, November 13, 2003 12:43:37 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Barring surprises, we will institute a code freeze in the 7.4 branch tonight with an eye to wrapping the release Sunday. Is anyone aware of critical loose ends that still need to be dealt with? The only thing o

[HACKERS] Any more "must fix" issues for 7.4?

2003-11-13 Thread Tom Lane
Barring surprises, we will institute a code freeze in the 7.4 branch tonight with an eye to wrapping the release Sunday. Is anyone aware of critical loose ends that still need to be dealt with? The only thing on my own radar screen is a couple of reports of the stats collector failing to start on