On Friday 24 October 2003 00:01, Christoph Haller wrote:
>
> A pg_compat_chk utility sounds great.
> No idea, if this is practical, but it's desirable - at least to me.
Well, I'm confident the first 90% is practical just by running some regexps
against a pg_dumped schema. It doesn't need to guara
>
> On Wednesday 22 October 2003 07:37, Neil Conway wrote:
> > The second audience is the people who are really interested in exactly
> > what has changed between the new release of PostgreSQL and the previous
> > release series. It is important that we make it easy for an admin
> > planning a Pos
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 07:37, Neil Conway wrote:
> The second audience is the people who are really interested in exactly
> what has changed between the new release of PostgreSQL and the previous
> release series. It is important that we make it easy for an admin
> planning a PostgreSQL upgra
