On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 04/17/2014 12:16 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 7:11 AM, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
- A flag like BGW_UNREGISTER_ON_RESTART;
I would be OK with this, maybe modulo the name.
- To
Hi all
I've been using the dynamic BGWorker support for some recent work, and I
think I've found an issue with how postmaster restarts are handled.
TL;DR: I don't think there's a safe way to use a BGWorker (static or
dynamic) with bgw_restart_time != BGW_NEVER_RESTART and a bgw_main_arg
Datum
On 04/16/2014 02:37 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
Hi all
I've been using the dynamic BGWorker support for some recent work, and I
think I've found an issue with how postmaster restarts are handled.
TL;DR: I don't think there's a safe way to use a BGWorker (static or
dynamic) with
On 2014-04-16 19:11:37 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 04/16/2014 02:37 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
Hi all
I've been using the dynamic BGWorker support for some recent work, and I
think I've found an issue with how postmaster restarts are handled.
TL;DR: I don't think there's a safe way
On 04/16/2014 07:21 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-04-16 19:11:37 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
On 04/16/2014 02:37 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
Hi all
I've been using the dynamic BGWorker support for some recent work, and I
think I've found an issue with how postmaster restarts are handled.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 7:11 AM, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
TL;DR: I don't think there's a safe way to use a BGWorker (static or
dynamic) with bgw_restart_time != BGW_NEVER_RESTART and a bgw_main_arg
Datum that points into shared memory, and think we might need a API
change to
On 04/17/2014 12:16 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 7:11 AM, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
- A flag like BGW_UNREGISTER_ON_RESTART;
I would be OK with this, maybe modulo the name.
- To always unregister dynamic bgws on postmaster shm clear + restart;
I don't
