On Tuesday, October 09, 2012 7:38 PM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 09.10.2012 16:42, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > I have observed that currently during recovery, while it applies the
> WAL
> > records even if it detects that there is a corrupt record
> >
> > by crc validation, it proceeds.
> >
> > Basic
On 10.10.2012 17:37, Amit Kapila wrote:
On Tuesday, October 09, 2012 7:38 PM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
We rely on the CRC to detect end of WAL during recovery. If the
system crashes while the WAL is being flushed to disk, it's normal that
there's a corrupt (ie. partially written) record at the e
On 09.10.2012 16:42, Amit Kapila wrote:
I have observed that currently during recovery, while it applies the WAL
records even if it detects that there is a corrupt record
by crc validation, it proceeds.
Basically ReadRecord(), returns NULL in such cases which makes the behavior
same as it has r
I have observed that currently during recovery, while it applies the WAL
records even if it detects that there is a corrupt record
by crc validation, it proceeds.
Basically ReadRecord(), returns NULL in such cases which makes the behavior
same as it has reached end of WAL.
After that server get
