Re: Tom Lane 2016-07-01 <26357.1467400...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> I made some mostly-cosmetic changes to this and pushed it.
I confirm that Debian's out-of-tree python3 build works now when
invoked directly in the relevant plpython/hstore_plpython
subdirectories. Thanks!
Christoph
--
Sent via pgsql-h
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier writes:
>> Yes that would be indeed cleaner this way. I have poked a bit at that
>> and finished with the attached that defines some rules to generate all
>> the files needed.
>
> I made some mostly-cosmetic changes to this and pus
Michael Paquier writes:
> Yes that would be indeed cleaner this way. I have poked a bit at that
> and finished with the attached that defines some rules to generate all
> the files needed.
I made some mostly-cosmetic changes to this and pushed it. One thing
to note is that it seemed to me you'd
Michael Paquier writes:
> Yes that would be indeed cleaner this way. I have poked a bit at that
> and finished with the attached that defines some rules to generate all
> the files needed. But actually it does not seem to be enough, for
> example on OSX this would fail to compile because it cannot
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> Since Tom proposed the approach which Michael's patch takes, I'm
>> hoping he will review and commit this. If it is left to me to fix it,
>> I may just adopt a minimal fix.
>
> I'll take a look at it.
Note: the patch is n
Robert Haas writes:
> Since Tom proposed the approach which Michael's patch takes, I'm
> hoping he will review and commit this. If it is left to me to fix it,
> I may just adopt a minimal fix.
I'll take a look at it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> [Action required within 72 hours. This is a generic notification.]
>
> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item. Robert,
> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> item. If some o
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:26:00PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:22 AM, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Re: Tom Lane 2016-06-27 <31398.1467036...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> >> Bjorn Munch reported off-list that this sequence:
> >>
> >> unpack tarball, cd into it
> >> ./configure ...
>
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:22 AM, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Tom Lane 2016-06-27 <31398.1467036...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
>> Bjorn Munch reported off-list that this sequence:
>>
>> unpack tarball, cd into it
>> ./configure ...
>> cd src/test/regress
>> make
>>
>> no longer works in 9.6beta2, where it did
Re: Tom Lane 2016-06-27 <31398.1467036...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Bjorn Munch reported off-list that this sequence:
>
> unpack tarball, cd into it
> ./configure ...
> cd src/test/regress
> make
>
> no longer works in 9.6beta2, where it did work in previous releases.
> I have confirmed both statements.
Bjorn Munch reported off-list that this sequence:
unpack tarball, cd into it
./configure ...
cd src/test/regress
make
no longer works in 9.6beta2, where it did work in previous releases.
I have confirmed both statements. The failure looks like
gcc -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wde
11 matches
Mail list logo