Re: [HACKERS] Broken link in PG docs

2006-10-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
I added the citeseer URL as an SGML comment. Neil is trying to contact the author. --- Tom Lane wrote: > Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I agree the link should be fixed, but I can't see another canonical > > lo

Re: [HACKERS] Broken link in PG docs

2006-09-25 Thread Tom Lane
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I agree the link should be fixed, but I can't see another canonical > location for the document online: linking to CiteSeer (which itself is > generated from the mention in our online docs) is probably not wise. citeseer's cache still has the paper, and in

Re: [HACKERS] Broken link in PG docs

2006-09-25 Thread Neil Conway
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 16:44 +0530, Gurjeet Singh wrote: > At the end of the following page: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/indexes-partial.html > > there is a link [Generalized Partial Indexes] which is pointing to a > missing link. I agree the link should be fixed, but I can't s

[HACKERS] Broken link in PG docs

2006-09-25 Thread Gurjeet Singh
At the end of the following page:http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/indexes-partial.html there is a link [ Generalized Partial Indexes] which is pointing to a missing link.    Can someone update the link with a live doc? Probably  this one Regards,-- [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] gmail