So we don't want COPY FROM VIEW in 8.2? Even if we later support COPY
(SELECT ...), aren't we still going to want to copy from a view? I
guess not because you would just do COPY (SELECT * FROM view)?
---
Tom Lane wrote:
>
Hannu Krosing wrote:
> ?hel kenal p?eval, P, 2006-05-28 kell 13:53, kirjutas Alvaro Herrera:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been having the COPY FROM patch that was posted on pgsql-patches
> > some time ago (I think from Hannu Krossing),
>
> Not by/from me :)
Patch was from Karel Zak:
http://can
Ühel kenal päeval, P, 2006-05-28 kell 13:53, kirjutas Alvaro Herrera:
> Hi,
>
> I've been having the COPY FROM patch that was posted on pgsql-patches
> some time ago (I think from Hannu Krossing),
Not by/from me :)
--
Hannu Krosing
Database Architect
Skype Technologies OÜ
Aka
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 03:59:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I've been having the COPY FROM patch that was posted on
> > pgsql-patches some time ago (I think from Hannu Krossing), sitting
> > on my machine, with the intention to commit it for 8.2. Howe
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been having the COPY FROM patch that was posted on pgsql-patches
> some time ago (I think from Hannu Krossing), sitting on my machine, with
> the intention to commit it for 8.2. However there's something I'm not
> very sure about -- the patch creat
Hi,
I've been having the COPY FROM patch that was posted on pgsql-patches
some time ago (I think from Hannu Krossing), sitting on my machine, with
the intention to commit it for 8.2. However there's something I'm not
very sure about -- the patch creates an execution plan by passing a
literal "SEL
