Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > Now, it annoys me that we now have three places that know about object
> > types supported by event triggers: there's a large struct of command tag
> > substrings (event_trigger_support), then there's these two functions.
> > It might be better to add O
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Now, it annoys me that we now have three places that know about object
> types supported by event triggers: there's a large struct of command tag
> substrings (event_trigger_support), then there's these two functions.
> It might be better to add ObjectType and ObjectClass
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Now, it annoys me that we now have three places that know about object
> types supported by event triggers: there's a large struct of command tag
> substrings (event_trigger_support), then there's these two functions.
> It might be better to add ObjectType and ObjectClass
Will Leinweber wrote:
> On ref 8507907 when compiling with clang on os x, I got this warning which
> seems like a possible bug.
>
> I thought to report this because I imagine clang isn't frequently used
> day-to-day by most.
Ugh. My fault. Yes, this is a bug.
I don't see any nice way to conver
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Will Leinweber wrote:
> On ref 8507907 when compiling with clang on os x, I got this warning which
> seems like a possible bug.
>
> I thought to report this because I imagine clang isn't frequently used
> day-to-day by most.
I actually reported a bug that was thro
On ref 8507907 when compiling with clang on os x, I got this warning which
seems like a possible bug.
I thought to report this because I imagine clang isn't frequently used
day-to-day by most.
dependency.c:213:36: warning: implicit conversion from enumeration type
'ObjectClass' (aka 'enum ObjectC
