Re: [HACKERS] Cleaner build output when not much has changed

2014-03-11 Thread Gurjeet Singh
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.comwrote: Gurjeet Singh wrote: On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Gurjeet Singh gurj...@singh.im writes: I was looking for ways to reduce the noise in Postgres make output,

Re: [HACKERS] Cleaner build output when not much has changed

2014-03-10 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Gurjeet Singh wrote: On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Gurjeet Singh gurj...@singh.im writes: I was looking for ways to reduce the noise in Postgres make output, specifically, I wanted to eliminate the Nothing to be done for `all' messages, since

[HACKERS] Cleaner build output when not much has changed

2013-11-26 Thread Gurjeet Singh
I was looking for ways to reduce the noise in Postgres make output, specifically, I wanted to eliminate the Nothing to be done for `all' messages, since they don't add much value, and just ad to the clutter. Most of the solutions I have seen propose grepping out the noisy parts. But one of them

Re: [HACKERS] Cleaner build output when not much has changed

2013-11-26 Thread Tom Lane
Gurjeet Singh gurj...@singh.im writes: I was looking for ways to reduce the noise in Postgres make output, specifically, I wanted to eliminate the Nothing to be done for `all' messages, since they don't add much value, and just ad to the clutter. Why don't you just use make -s if you don't

Re: [HACKERS] Cleaner build output when not much has changed

2013-11-26 Thread Gurjeet Singh
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Gurjeet Singh gurj...@singh.im writes: I was looking for ways to reduce the noise in Postgres make output, specifically, I wanted to eliminate the Nothing to be done for `all' messages, since they don't add much value,

Re: [HACKERS] Cleaner build output when not much has changed

2013-11-26 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane wrote: I'm pretty suspicious of cute changes like this to the makefiles. They too often have unexpected side-effects. (I'm still pissed off about having to manually remove objfiles.txt to get it to rebuild a .o file, for instance.) Yeah, I've been bitten by that as well and I don't

Re: [HACKERS] Cleaner build output when not much has changed

2013-11-26 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 11/26/13, 1:36 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: A patch to use non-recursive make to construct the backend would be very much appreciated. We've talked about it at least two times, but no one seems interested enough to put in the effort. References? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list

Re: [HACKERS] Cleaner build output when not much has changed

2013-11-26 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Peter Eisentraut wrote: On 11/26/13, 1:36 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: A patch to use non-recursive make to construct the backend would be very much appreciated. We've talked about it at least two times, but no one seems interested enough to put in the effort. References? What, you want