Added to TODO:
* Prefix command-line utilities like createuser with 'pg_'
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-06/msg00025.php
---
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce
David Fetter wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:12:22PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:52:39PM -, Andrew Hammond wrote:
On Jun 5, 9:19 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alvaro Herrera) wrote:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:52:39PM -, Andrew Hammond wrote:
+1. Given the prevalence of the pg_foo convention, those names are
clunky. So is initdb. I'm less creative than Zdenek, so I'd suggest
simply renaming to pg_createuser
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:12:22PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:52:39PM -, Andrew Hammond wrote:
On Jun 5, 9:19 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alvaro Herrera) wrote:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this a TODO?
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:52:39PM -, Andrew Hammond wrote:
On Jun 5, 9:19 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alvaro Herrera) wrote:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this a TODO?
I don't think so; there is no demand from anybody but Zdenek to
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:52:39PM -, Andrew Hammond wrote:
On Jun 5, 9:19 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alvaro Herrera) wrote:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this a TODO?
I don't think so; there is no demand from anybody
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this a TODO?
I don't think so; there is no demand from anybody but Zdenek to remove
those programs. Has it ever even come up before?
Tom, Bruce
I started with postgres 6.5 as administrator and from this version names
of these
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this a TODO?
I don't think so; there is no demand from anybody but Zdenek to remove
those programs. Has it ever even come up before?
Personally I found really strange to have createuser and createdb
shipped by
On Jun 5, 9:19 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alvaro Herrera) wrote:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this a TODO?
I don't think so; there is no demand from anybody but Zdenek to remove
those programs. Has it ever even come up before?
Tom Lane napsal(a):
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
And what about replace all scripts by one command e.g pg_cmd with
following interface:
Well, I don't think rolling up the miscellaneous commands into a single
binary with behaviour dependent on arg[0] is a bad
Is this a TODO?
---
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Tom Lane napsal(a):
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
And what about replace all scripts by one command e.g pg_cmd with
following interface:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this a TODO?
I don't think so; there is no demand from anybody but Zdenek to remove
those programs. Has it ever even come up before?
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this a TODO?
I don't think so; there is no demand from anybody but Zdenek to remove
those programs. Has it ever even come up before?
No. Agreed.
--
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB
in the name somewhere?
...Robert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 10:31 AM
To: Bruce Momjian
Cc: Zdenek Kotala; Andrew Dunstan; Peter Eisentraut;
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Command tags
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
The messages output by the scripts always seemed unnecessary to me, e.g.,
$ createdb foo
CREATE DATABASE
A Unix program (hi Magnus) shouldn't need to say anything if the requested
action succeeded.
I believe the history of this output is actually that these
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
The messages output by the scripts always seemed unnecessary to me, e.g.,
$ createdb foo
CREATE DATABASE
A Unix program (hi Magnus) shouldn't need to say anything if the requested
action succeeded.
I believe the history of this output is actually that these scripts
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
And what about replace all scripts by one command e.g pg_cmd with
following interface:
pg_cmd create database ...
create role ...
drop database ...
list database
...
It solves potential name collision (for example createuser should
collide
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
And what about replace all scripts by one command e.g pg_cmd with
following interface:
pg_cmd create database ...
And we'll break a million applications that rely on the command names.
If you want that, it already exists:
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
And what about replace all scripts by one command e.g pg_cmd with
following interface:
pg_cmd create database ...
And we'll break a million applications that rely on the command names.
Compatibility is
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
And what about replace all scripts by one command e.g pg_cmd with
following interface:
pg_cmd create database ...
And we'll break a million applications that rely on the command names.
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
And what about replace all scripts by one command e.g pg_cmd with
following interface:
Well, I don't think rolling up the miscellaneous commands into a single
binary with behaviour dependent on arg[0] is a bad idea.
I don't
On 5/31/07, Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The messages output by the scripts always seemed unnecessary to me, e.g
.,
$ createdb foo
CREATE DATABASE
A Unix program (hi Magnus) shouldn't need to say anything if the requested
action succeeded.
I believe the history of this output is
CAJ CAJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can it me made to return an integer like most UNIX commands do? This helps
immensely when writing shell scripts.
Don't they do that already? If not, that's a bug quite independent of
Peter's cosmetic concern.
regards, tom lane
On 5/31/07, CAJ CAJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can it me made to return an integer like most UNIX commands do? This
helps
immensely when writing shell scripts.
Don't they do that already? If not, that's a bug quite independent of
Peter's cosmetic concern.
Ah, I just tested it.
24 matches
Mail list logo
