On 2/2/15 7:49 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
The comment for the BackgroundWorkerSlot structure tripped me up reviewing
Robert's background worker patch; it made it clear that you need to use a
memory barrier before setting in_use, but normally you'd n
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> The comment for the BackgroundWorkerSlot structure tripped me up reviewing
> Robert's background worker patch; it made it clear that you need to use a
> memory barrier before setting in_use, but normally you'd never need to worry
> about that bec
The comment for the BackgroundWorkerSlot structure tripped me up reviewing
Robert's background worker patch; it made it clear that you need to use a
memory barrier before setting in_use, but normally you'd never need to worry
about that because RegisterDynamicBackgroundWorker() handles it for y
