When grilled further on (Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:40:50 -0500 (EST)),
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> confessed:
>
> Well, it must have hit the lists if I have put it in the patch queue, no?
>
> ---
>
> Hey Bruce,
>
> I never
Per a brief conversation with Tom, I've created a patch for adding support for
'week' within the date_trunc function.
Within the patch I added a couple of test cases and associated target output,
and changed the documentation to add 'week' appropriately.
Comments? Should I of bypassed this list
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Robert Creager wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
>
> Per a brief conversation with Tom, I've created a patch for adding support for
> 'week' within the date_trunc function.
>
> Within the
Well, it must have hit the lists if I have put it in the patch queue, no?
---
Hey Bruce,
I never saw the patch hit the hackers list. Did any of you smart folks take a
look at it?
Cheers,
Rob
When grilled further on (Wed,
Hey Bruce,
I never saw the patch hit the hackers list. Did any of you smart folks take a
look at it?
Cheers,
Rob
When grilled further on (Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:58:02 -0500 (EST)),
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> confessed:
>
> Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list
