Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2011-11 Update

2011-12-16 Thread Peter Geoghegan
On 15 December 2011 19:07, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: I think that the tuplesort comparison overhead reduction is in Peter G's hands to rebase at the moment; I will look at that again when it reemerges. Yes, sorry about that - I was a little bit sidetracked by something else.

Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2011-11 Update

2011-12-16 Thread Greg Smith
It's time for another one of these again. We're now just past the nominal 1 month goal of each CommitFest, and as you can obviously see from my list traffic I'm trying to close things up. One of the CF goals is to give everyone who submits something a fair review. There are a few patches

Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2011-11 Update

2011-12-15 Thread Robert Haas
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: There's a normal sized plate lined up for Robert since he's been keeping up better; in no particular order: -More review on the always a new surprise Fix Leaky Views Problem, again -Extra fun with Tuplesort comparison

[HACKERS] CommitFest 2011-11 Update

2011-12-10 Thread Greg Smith
All of the information on the CommitFest app is as accurate as I could make it now, I made a pass over every open thread there to look for major changes that hadn't gotten message ID archive links. Since the official start 13 patches have been committed and 6 bounced out. Reminder notes have