"Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, looks like the error below is a Win32 thing. The patch attached
> #ifdef'd out the permissions check on the private key file as it won't
> work under Windows anyway (a similar check in postmaster.c has has
> already been ifdef'd out for the same reason)
> -Original Message-
> From: Merlin Moncure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 June 2004 15:40
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Compile failure with SSL
>
> I had made the same changes as you to be_secure...
Dave Page wrote:
> OK, looks like the error below is a Win32 thing. The patch attached
> #ifdef'd out the permissions check on the private key file as it won't
> work under Windows anyway (a similar check in postmaster.c has has
> already been ifdef'd out for the same reason).
>
> Incidently, the
19 June 2004 23:24
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [HACKERS] Compile failure with SSL
>
> I think this is another on of those 'might be Win32 specific'
> problems.
> When building on XP, with OpenSSL 0.9.7c (from the bitWalk
> MinGW tools), I get the follow
I think this is another on of those 'might be Win32 specific' problems.
When building on XP, with OpenSSL 0.9.7c (from the bitWalk MinGW tools),
I get the following failure:
gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wmissing-declarations -I../../../src/include -I./src/include/port/w
