On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Moving discussion to -hackers, this isn't really a bug, it's an
> architectural issue with the new in-tree approach.
>
> Short recap: With the patch applied in [1] ff, sequences partially
> behave transactional (because pg_sequence is updated
Hi,
Moving discussion to -hackers, this isn't really a bug, it's an
architectural issue with the new in-tree approach.
Short recap: With the patch applied in [1] ff, sequences partially
behave transactional (because pg_sequence is updated transactionally),
partially non-transctionally (because th
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 04:55:45PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On April 27, 2017 12:06:55 AM PDT, Michael Paquier
> > wrote:
> >>On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Andres Freund
> >>wrote:
> >>> More fun:
> >>>
> >>> A: CREATE SEQUENCE