On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 09/02/2014 11:10 AM, Sawada Masahiko wrote:
The currently patch dose not hack catalog, just create new index
concurrently and
swap them.
So, It is supporting only UNIQUE index, I think.
UNIQUE indexes, but not a
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On 2014-08-26 12:44:43 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
I always was of the opinion that a exclusive lock is still *MUCH* better
than what we
On 08/25/2014 02:36 PM, Sawada Masahiko wrote:
Hi all,
Attached WIP patch adds -C (--concurrently) option for reindexdb
command for concurrently reindexing.
If we specify -C option with any table then reindexdb do reindexing
concurrently with minimum lock necessary.
Note that we cannot use
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 08/25/2014 02:36 PM, Sawada Masahiko wrote:
Hi all,
Attached WIP patch adds -C (--concurrently) option for reindexdb
command for concurrently reindexing.
If we specify -C option with any table then reindexdb do
On 09/02/2014 11:10 AM, Sawada Masahiko wrote:
The currently patch dose not hack catalog, just create new index
concurrently and
swap them.
So, It is supporting only UNIQUE index, I think.
UNIQUE indexes, but not a UNIQUE constraint backed by a UNIQUE index, or
a PRIMARY KEY constraint backed
On 2014-08-26 12:44:43 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
+many. Although I'm not sure if we managed to find a safe relation swap.
Well we didn't AFAIK. With the latest patch provided I could not
really find any whole in
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On 2014-08-26 12:44:43 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
I always was of the opinion that a exclusive lock is still *MUCH* better
than what we have today.
Well, if somebody has some interest in that, here is a rebased patch
Hi all,
Attached WIP patch adds -C (--concurrently) option for reindexdb
command for concurrently reindexing.
If we specify -C option with any table then reindexdb do reindexing
concurrently with minimum lock necessary.
Note that we cannot use '-s' option (for system catalog) and '-C'
option at
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Sawada Masahiko sawada.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached WIP patch adds -C (--concurrently) option for reindexdb
command for concurrently reindexing.
If we specify -C option with any table then reindexdb do reindexing
concurrently with minimum lock necessary.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Sawada Masahiko sawada.m...@gmail.com
wrote:
Attached WIP patch adds -C (--concurrently) option for reindexdb
command for concurrently reindexing.
If we specify -C option with
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Sawada Masahiko sawada.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Sawada Masahiko sawada.m...@gmail.com
wrote:
Attached WIP patch adds -C (--concurrently) option for
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Sawada Masahiko sawada.m...@gmail.com
wrote:
this might be difficult to call this as --concurrently.
It might need to be change the name.
I'm OK to say that as --concurrently if the
Michael Paquier wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Sawada Masahiko sawada.m...@gmail.com
wrote:
this might be difficult to call this as --concurrently.
It might need to be change the name.
I'm OK to say
On August 25, 2014 10:35:20 PM CEST, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Michael Paquier wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Sawada Masahiko
sawada.m...@gmail.com wrote:
this might be difficult to call
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de wrote:
On August 25, 2014 10:35:20 PM CEST, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Michael Paquier wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 4:33 PM,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
+many. Although I'm not sure if we managed to find a safe relation swap.
Well we didn't AFAIK. With the latest patch provided I could not
really find any whole in the logic, and Andres felt that something may
be wrong
16 matches
Mail list logo
