On 01/19/2013 05:42 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
Hi,
I want to test my lock_timeout code under Windows and
I compiled the whole PG universe with the MinGW cross-compiler
for 64-bit under Fedora 18.
You're significantly better off compiling for native Windows if at all
possible. Windows cloud
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
*sigh*. Don't post after midnight. Of course, this isn't relevant to a
cross-compiling environment, where repeated invocations of make
repeatedly build the executables.
The question is whether we care enough about this case to fix it.
I think we
Hi,
I want to test my lock_timeout code under Windows and
I compiled the whole PG universe with the MinGW cross-compiler
for 64-bit under Fedora 18.
The problem contrib directories where Makefile contains
PROGRAM = ...
The executables binaries are created without the .exe suffix. E.g.:
Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
I want to test my lock_timeout code under Windows and
I compiled the whole PG universe with the MinGW cross-compiler
for 64-bit under Fedora 18.
The problem contrib directories where Makefile contains
PROGRAM = ...
The executables binaries are created
2013-01-18 22:52 keltezéssel, Alvaro Herrera írta:
Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
I want to test my lock_timeout code under Windows and
I compiled the whole PG universe with the MinGW cross-compiler
for 64-bit under Fedora 18.
The problem contrib directories where Makefile contains
PROGRAM =
On 01/18/2013 05:19 PM, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
2013-01-18 22:52 keltezéssel, Alvaro Herrera írta:
Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
I want to test my lock_timeout code under Windows and
I compiled the whole PG universe with the MinGW cross-compiler
for 64-bit under Fedora 18.
The problem
2013-01-18 23:37 keltezéssel, Andrew Dunstan írta:
On 01/18/2013 05:19 PM, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
2013-01-18 22:52 keltezéssel, Alvaro Herrera írta:
Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
I want to test my lock_timeout code under Windows and
I compiled the whole PG universe with the MinGW
On 01/18/2013 05:45 PM, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
2013-01-18 23:37 keltezéssel, Andrew Dunstan írta:
On 01/18/2013 05:19 PM, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
2013-01-18 22:52 keltezéssel, Alvaro Herrera írta:
Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
I want to test my lock_timeout code under Windows and
I
On 01/18/2013 07:03 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
It's not a good idea it seems.
Because that's only half of what I suggested.
This patch seems to do the right thing.
It probably needs to be applied to all the live branches.
cheers
andrew
diff --git a/src/makefiles/pgxs.mk
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
This patch seems to do the right thing.
Hmm ... seems kinda grotty ... isn't there a cleaner way?
It probably needs to be applied to all the live branches.
Agreed on back-patching once we have the right thing, but I don't like
this version too much.
On 01/18/2013 11:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
This patch seems to do the right thing.
Hmm ... seems kinda grotty ... isn't there a cleaner way?
It probably needs to be applied to all the live branches.
Agreed on back-patching once we have the right
On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 17:37 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
ifdef PROGRAM
$(PROGRAM): $(OBJS)
- $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(OBJS) $(PG_LIBS) $(LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS_EX)
$(LIBS) -o $@
+ $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(OBJS) $(PG_LIBS) $(LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS_EX)
$(LIBS) -o $@$(X)
endif
Wouldn't it
On 01/18/2013 11:59 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
The above is the way it's done everywhere else in the source tree.
I think the reason this works is that either make or the system call
that make uses is aware of this naming issue somehow.
Oh, hmm, all these years playing with this stuff and
2013-01-19 01:03 keltezéssel, Andrew Dunstan írta:
On 01/18/2013 05:45 PM, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
2013-01-18 23:37 keltezéssel, Andrew Dunstan írta:
On 01/18/2013 05:19 PM, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
2013-01-18 22:52 keltezéssel, Alvaro Herrera írta:
Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
I want
2013-01-19 02:03 keltezéssel, Andrew Dunstan írta:
On 01/18/2013 07:03 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
It's not a good idea it seems.
Because that's only half of what I suggested.
This patch seems to do the right thing.
It probably needs to be applied to all the live branches.
cheers
15 matches
Mail list logo
