Re: [HACKERS] Conversion error of floating point numbers in pl/pgsql

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Kyotaro HORIGUCHI writes: >>> Hello. I found that 9.5 has an undocumented difference from 9.4 >>> in type cast in

Re: [HACKERS] Conversion error of floating point numbers in pl/pgsql

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Kyotaro HORIGUCHI writes: >> Hello. I found that 9.5 has an undocumented difference from 9.4 >> in type cast in pl/pgsql and I think it might better be mentioned >> as a change of behavior in

Re: [HACKERS] Conversion error of floating point numbers in pl/pgsql

Kyotaro HORIGUCHI writes: > Hello. I found that 9.5 has an undocumented difference from 9.4 > in type cast in pl/pgsql and I think it might better be mentioned > as a change of behavior in release notes. > Whether do you think it is worth mentioning or not in

Re: [HACKERS] Conversion error of floating point numbers in pl/pgsql

Hello, At Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:49:54 -0500, Tom Lane wrote in <32508.1447685...@sss.pgh.pa.us> > Kyotaro HORIGUCHI writes: > > Hello. I found that 9.5 has an undocumented difference from 9.4 > > in type cast in pl/pgsql and I think it might

[HACKERS] Conversion error of floating point numbers in pl/pgsql

Hello. I found that 9.5 has an undocumented difference from 9.4 in type cast in pl/pgsql and I think it might better be mentioned as a change of behavior in release notes. Whether do you think it is worth mentioning or not in release notes? = 9.4 and 9.5 has difference in casting between