[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Michel POURE) stated in
comp.databases.postgresql.hackers:
Le Mardi 25 Novembre 2003 07:32, Randolf Richardson a écrit :
I'm curious, has anyone consulted with a lawyer on this?
Yes, the lawyer concluded that the number 2003 had been both
registered as a trademark
Le Mardi 25 Novembre 2003 07:32, Randolf Richardson a crit :
I'm curious, has anyone consulted with a lawyer on this?
Yes, the lawyer concluded that the number 2003 had been both registered as a
trademark and a patented invention. Therefore, it is very likely that
Humanity will be able to jump
Today I've d-loaded PostgreSQL 7.3.4.
I've seen in
$PGSQLD/doc/html/index.html
it still says
Copyright (C) 1996-2002
shouldn't it be 2003?
We only update the copyright notices when we are preparing a major
release. (Bruce just did it a week or two back for 7.4, for example.)
Updating
Today I've d-loaded PostgreSQL 7.3.4.
I've seen in
$PGSQLD/doc/html/index.html
it still says
Copyright (C) 1996-2002
shouldn't it be 2003?
Regards, Christoph
PS
I've sent this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] before.
But in return I've got
Your message to pgsql-docs has been delayed, and requires the
Christoph Haller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Today I've d-loaded PostgreSQL 7.3.4.
I've seen in
$PGSQLD/doc/html/index.html
it still says
Copyright (C) 1996-2002
shouldn't it be 2003?
We only update the copyright notices when we are preparing a major
release. (Bruce just did it a week or two
