Re: [HACKERS] Determine state of cluster (HA)

2017-10-17 Thread Vik Fearing
On 10/17/2017 08:40 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On 10/16/2017 07:31 PM, Craig Ringer wrote: >> On 17 October 2017 at 01:02, Joshua D. Drake >> wrote: >>> On 10/15/2017 07:39 PM, Craig Ringer wrote: > - Get info about master. We should finish merging recovery.conf

Re: [HACKERS] Determine state of cluster (HA)

2017-10-17 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On 10/16/2017 07:31 PM, Craig Ringer wrote: On 17 October 2017 at 01:02, Joshua D. Drake wrote: On 10/15/2017 07:39 PM, Craig Ringer wrote: - Get info about master. We should finish merging recovery.conf into postgresql.conf. Definitely. There's a patch from

Re: [HACKERS] Determine state of cluster (HA)

2017-10-16 Thread Craig Ringer
On 17 October 2017 at 01:02, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On 10/15/2017 07:39 PM, Craig Ringer wrote: >> >> On 13 October 2017 at 08:50, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >>> >>> -Hackers, >>> >>> I had a long call with a firm developing front end proxy/cache/HA

Re: [HACKERS] Determine state of cluster (HA)

2017-10-16 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On 10/16/2017 03:55 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:39 AM, Craig Ringer > wrote: On 13 October 2017 at 08:50, Joshua D. Drake > wrote: > 5.  There is

Re: [HACKERS] Determine state of cluster (HA)

2017-10-16 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On 10/15/2017 07:39 PM, Craig Ringer wrote: On 13 October 2017 at 08:50, Joshua D. Drake wrote: -Hackers, I had a long call with a firm developing front end proxy/cache/HA for Postgres today. Essentially the software is a replacement for PGPool in entirety but also

Re: [HACKERS] Determine state of cluster (HA)

2017-10-16 Thread Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:39:16 +0800 Craig Ringer wrote: > On 13 October 2017 at 08:50, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > I had a long call with a firm developing front end proxy/cache/HA for > > Postgres today. Essentially the software is a replacement

Re: [HACKERS] Determine state of cluster (HA)

2017-10-16 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:39 AM, Craig Ringer wrote: > On 13 October 2017 at 08:50, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > 5. There is no way to connect to a db node with something akin to > > SQL-Server's "application intent" flags, to allow a connection to

Re: [HACKERS] Determine state of cluster (HA)

2017-10-15 Thread Craig Ringer
On 13 October 2017 at 08:50, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > -Hackers, > > I had a long call with a firm developing front end proxy/cache/HA for > Postgres today. Essentially the software is a replacement for PGPool in > entirety but also supports analytics etc... When I was

Re: [HACKERS] Determine state of cluster (HA)

2017-10-13 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On 10/12/2017 05:50 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: -Hackers, Bumping this. I had a long call with a firm developing front end proxy/cache/HA for Postgres today. Essentially the software is a replacement for PGPool in entirety but also supports analytics etc... When I was asking them about

[HACKERS] Determine state of cluster (HA)

2017-10-12 Thread Joshua D. Drake
-Hackers, I had a long call with a firm developing front end proxy/cache/HA for Postgres today. Essentially the software is a replacement for PGPool in entirety but also supports analytics etc... When I was asking them about pain points they talked about the below and I was wondering if this