Dave Page wrote:
I have now moved the wiki installation to:
http://developer.postgresql.org/
BTW: I am wondering if there is an RSS feed of the changes?
On my wiki I have an RSS feed for every page, subwiki (aka area) and the
entire wiki people can subscribe to:
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
I have now moved the wiki installation to:
http://developer.postgresql.org/
BTW: I am wondering if there is an RSS feed of the changes?
On my wiki I have an RSS feed for every page, subwiki (aka area) and the
entire wiki
I have now moved the wiki installation to:
http://developer.postgresql.org/
BTW: I am wondering if there is an RSS feed of the changes?
There is.
http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php?title=Special:Recentchangesfe
ed=rss
//Magnus
---(end of
Hi, Martijn,
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
2. I can see the official todo list being in CVS, which gives it all
the access protection it needs. A wiki todo list can stay where it is,
just that it's not official.
[I've just made a reference to the TODO list in CVS from the wiki, that
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 12:28:54PM +0200, Markus Schaber wrote:
Maybe you should rename the public writable Wiki page list to Wishlist
instead of Todo, to make the difference more explicit.
Hmm, all the stuff there now does refer to things that are on the TODO
list (I think). So it's not
Ok, so what is it you need help with?
On Sep 18, 2006, at 1:24 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 12:32:13PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Tom proposed a modest roadmap type experiment a week or so ago.
I'd like to see that pursued. After all, we know of
Jim Nasby wrote:
Ok, so what is it you need help with?
see previous discussion about what is required to keep a tracker system
healthy. In particular:
. items appearing in other media need to be put in the tracker
. items entered in the tracker need to be regularly triaged, reviewed
and
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 09:15:24PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gregory Stark wrote:
A TODO list people can freely add stuff to is precisely what would make it
useful. It would have things we don't already know.
I am just going to hope that you are
The wiki has been sitting there for two weeks and hasn't had
any problems.
Uh, you mean apart from the fact that it took very little time (days,
IIRC) before we had people writing attempts at user documentation,
somthing that we already have *two* different systems (interactive docs
+ new
Techdocs is a different problem all together. Josh has
already mentioned some problems with it. I can mention more.
[warning: thread hi-jack]
1. It isn't easy to login
Really? You're kidding, right? You click a link that requires login, and
you get a browser login box. How much easier can
Two points I'm not clear about on this thread though:
1. Authorized user: is that someone with an account, or
someone who has been authorized by someone else?
IIRC, the idea was someone with an account. Basically you add a (very
very small) hurdle so you only get the people who actually
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 03:09:29PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
The wiki has been sitting there for two weeks and hasn't had
any problems.
Uh, you mean apart from the fact that it took very little time (days,
IIRC) before we had people writing attempts at user documentation,
snip
The wiki has been sitting there for two weeks and hasn't had any
problems.
Uh, you mean apart from the fact that it took very little
time (days,
IIRC) before we had people writing attempts at user documentation,
snip
Really? Where was that? Did it get deleted in the meantime?
1. Authorized user: is that someone with an account, or someone who has
been authorized by someone else?
In my mind it is someone who without threw a process of email
confirmation. Just to help stave off the amount of trolling that may happen.
Joshua D. Drake
2. I can see the official
1. It isn't easy to login
Really? You're kidding, right? You click a link that requires login, and
you get a browser login box. How much easier can it be?
What URL are you talking about?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs
Where do I click login? Where do I click create account? Where
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Two points I'm not clear about on this thread though:
1. Authorized user: is that someone with an account, or
someone who has been authorized by someone else?
IIRC, the idea was someone with an account. Basically you add a (very
very small) hurdle so you only get the
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. Authorized user: is that someone with an account, or someone who has
been authorized by someone else?
In my mind it is someone who without threw a process of email confirmation.
Just to help stave off the amount of trolling that may happen.
I
1. It isn't easy to login
Really? You're kidding, right? You click a link that
requires login,
and you get a browser login box. How much easier can it be?
What URL are you talking about?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs
Yes.
Where do I click login? Where do I click
-hackers@postgresql.org
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Sent: 17/09/06 14:22
Subject: RE: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Developer's Wiki
Dave took it off when he moved the wiki to it's correct place (being
developer.postgresql.org)
I left it there, but un-linked from the frontpage in this case
Gregory Stark wrote:
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. Authorized user: is that someone with an account, or someone who has
been authorized by someone else?
In my mind it is someone who without threw a process of email confirmation.
Just to help stave off the amount of trolling
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, Josh Berkus wrote:
Hi,
Greg,
I think the lessons of wikipedia is precisely that you *don't* want to add
such barriers. You want to let people add stuff pretty much freely. That
encourages people to get involved and put up information.
The other lesson of Wikipedia is
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org writes:
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 09:15:24PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Fortunately, none of the real developers would have to pay any attention
to any such page ... and you can bet they wouldn't.
If someone wants to spend an afternoon putting up a coherent
Tom Lane wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org writes:
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 09:15:24PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Fortunately, none of the real developers would have to pay any attention
to any such page ... and you can bet they wouldn't.
If someone wants to
Tom proposed a modest roadmap type experiment a week or so ago. I'd like
to see that pursued. After all, we know of some things that are at least
at first cut stage for 8.3, and a few things high on may people's
agenda. I'd also like to see some work done on using a tracker (for
features as
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 12:32:13PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Tom proposed a modest roadmap type experiment a week or so ago. I'd like
to see that pursued. After all, we know of some things that are at least
at first cut stage for 8.3, and a few things high on may people's
agenda. I'd
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 12:32:13PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Tom proposed a modest roadmap type experiment a week or so ago. I'd like
to see that pursued. After all, we know of some things that are at least
at first cut stage for 8.3, and a few things high on may
Martjin,
I was actually hoping for more feedback on the content itself. I'm
still not clear if it's supposed to be developers only - to the
exclusion of users or developers only - but accessable to anyone.
It should be readable by everyone, but editable only by authorized users.
--
Josh
Josh Berkus josh@agliodbs.com writes:
I was actually hoping for more feedback on the content itself. I'm
still not clear if it's supposed to be developers only - to the
exclusion of users or developers only - but accessable to anyone.
It should be readable by everyone, but editable only by
Greg,
I think the lessons of wikipedia is precisely that you *don't* want to add
such barriers. You want to let people add stuff pretty much freely. That
encourages people to get involved and put up information.
The other lesson of Wikipedia is that maintaining wiki quality for a generally
Gregory Stark wrote:
Josh Berkus josh@agliodbs.com writes:
I was actually hoping for more feedback on the content itself. I'm
still not clear if it's supposed to be developers only - to the
exclusion of users or developers only - but accessable to anyone.
It should be readable by everyone,
Josh Berkus josh@agliodbs.com writes:
The other lesson of Wikipedia is that maintaining wiki quality for a
generally
editable wiki requires a full-time dedicated staff. We don't even have any
volunteers who have 4 hours/week to commit to cleaning up the wiki, unless
you're
Gregory Stark wrote:
Josh Berkus josh@agliodbs.com writes:
The other lesson of Wikipedia is that maintaining wiki quality for a generally
editable wiki requires a full-time dedicated staff. We don't even have any
volunteers who have 4 hours/week to commit to cleaning up the wiki, unless
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gregory Stark wrote:
A TODO list people can freely add stuff to is precisely what would make it
useful. It would have things we don't already know.
I am just going to hope that you are kidding about this one.
Fortunately, none of the real developers
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 08:30:13PM -0700, Neil Conway wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout said:
Ok, it looks like pages can be arranged hierarchically.
Well, a prefix like Todo: is not the incantation one needs to use to
arrange pages in hierarchies. You probably want / to indicate a subpage:
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 11:46:12PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
Sounds reasonable to me.
Ok, I've typed some stuff in here:
http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:Contents
http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:Collate
Is this the kind of thing people are expecting?
Have a nice
Martijn van Oosterhout said:
Ok, it looks like pages can be arranged hierarchically.
Well, a prefix like Todo: is not the incantation one needs to use to
arrange pages in hierarchies. You probably want / to indicate a subpage:
i.e. Parent/Child. See
I have now moved the wiki installation to:
http://developer.postgresql.org/
Where it is currently available for use by any hackers for non-end-user
related activities. I haven't changed Greg's original configuration at all
so it is still open for use by anyone at present, however I have added an
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 08:33:41PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
I have now moved the wiki installation to:
http://developer.postgresql.org/
Ok, it looks like pages can be arranged hierarchically.
It would seems like pages named:
Todo:todo topic
would be a good idea for detailed info on todo
Sounds reasonable to me.
Regards, Dave
-Original Message-
From: Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org
To: Dave Page dpage@vale-housing.co.uk
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; PostgreSQL WWW [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02/09/06 23:08
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Developer's Wiki
On Sat, Sep 02
39 matches
Mail list logo