On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 18:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Brendan Jurd dire...@gmail.com writes:
Agreed that there are no doc bugs. The reason I suggested a backpatch
is that I'm concerned that a lot of people are going to be approaching
the whole Standby topic for the first time with 9.0, so it
On 14 October 2010 08:45, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Is someone working on a patch?
Yes, I will prepare a patch to get us started.
Cheers,
BJ
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Brendan Jurd dire...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I have just set up HS+SR for the first time, and for the most part,
the docs were excellent. The one exception for me was the discussion
On 12 October 2010 23:28, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Brendan Jurd dire...@gmail.com wrote:
I have just set up HS+SR for the first time, and for the most part,
the docs were excellent. The one exception for me was the discussion
of
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 02:24 +1100, Brendan Jurd wrote:
I'll drop this onto the next open commitfest. If it passes muster, it
sure wouldn't hurt to backpatch it to 9.0.
Committed. Not sure there's anything there worth backpatching? There
aren't any doc bugs there.
--
Simon Riggs
On 15 October 2010 05:33, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 02:24 +1100, Brendan Jurd wrote:
I'll drop this onto the next open commitfest. If it passes muster, it
sure wouldn't hurt to backpatch it to 9.0.
Committed. Not sure there's anything there worth
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 02:24 +1100, Brendan Jurd wrote:
I'll drop this onto the next open commitfest. If it passes muster, it
sure wouldn't hurt to backpatch it to 9.0.
Committed. Not sure there's anything there worth
Brendan Jurd dire...@gmail.com writes:
Agreed that there are no doc bugs. The reason I suggested a backpatch
is that I'm concerned that a lot of people are going to be approaching
the whole Standby topic for the first time with 9.0, so it would be
nice to give those folks an accessible
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Brendan Jurd dire...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I have just set up HS+SR for the first time, and for the most part,
the docs were excellent. The one exception for me was the discussion
of archive_cleanup_command. This is a pretty important part of
Hi folks,
I have just set up HS+SR for the first time, and for the most part,
the docs were excellent. The one exception for me was the discussion
of archive_cleanup_command. This is a pretty important part of
constructing a healthy standby server, and IMO the docs don't give it
the treatment
10 matches
Mail list logo
