Added to CVS.
---
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 03:46:07PM +0900, Curt Sampson wrote:
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. If not,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 09:15:22AM +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 01:29, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
The dumping is more of an extra, the original idea was to check for errors
in the datafiles. Hence the working name of pgfsck. At the moment the
dumping dumps only
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
But I think the most useful behaviour should be to dump system fields
too, so mildly knowledgeable sysadmin can import the dump and do the
right thing afterwards (like restore data as it was before transaction
nr 7000)
Well, i didn't
On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 12:52, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
Well, from my thinking about how you would use these fields in a logical
way, it seems it's possible for xmax to be non-zero if the transaction
numbered xmax was not committed. But in that case (unless it was a delete)
there would be
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 07:28:32PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
http://svana.org/kleptog/pgsql/page.sgml.txt
I don't know whatever SGML format this is using, so the layout is not great,
but the information should be accurate. I used it to create a program to
dump the datafiles
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 11:14:36AM -0500, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 07:28:32PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
http://svana.org/kleptog/pgsql/page.sgml.txt
I don't know whatever SGML format this is using, so the layout is not great,
but the information
On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 01:29, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
The dumping is more of an extra, the original idea was to check for errors
in the datafiles. Hence the working name of pgfsck. At the moment the
dumping dumps only tuples where xmax == 0 but I'm not sure if that's
correct.
AFAIK it
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Chapter 7 of the Developers guide in about the Page Format on disk and it's
a little out of date not to mention somewhat incomplete.
Indeed, this seems to have very little relation to reality :-(.
I
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 03:46:07PM +0900, Curt Sampson wrote:
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. If not, would patches be accepted to correct the situation?
Go for it.
Yes, please! I'd be happy to review and updated version.
[Please CC any replies, I'm subscribed nomail]
Hi,
Chapter 7 of the Developers guide in about the Page Format on disk and it's
a little out of date not to mention somewhat incomplete.
1. Is there documentation elsewhere (other than the source)?
2. If not, would patches be accepted to correct
Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Chapter 7 of the Developers guide in about the Page Format on disk and it's
a little out of date not to mention somewhat incomplete.
Indeed, this seems to have very little relation to reality :-(.
I didn't even realize that we had such a
11 matches
Mail list logo
