Re: [HACKERS] Dry-run mode for pg_archivecleanup

2012-02-06 Thread Alvaro Herrera

Excerpts from Gabriele Bartolini's message of mar ene 31 12:29:51 -0300 2012:
 Hi Robert,
 
 sorry for the delay.
 
 Il 27/01/12 15:47, Robert Haas ha scritto:
  This email thread seems to have trailed off without reaching a 
  conclusion. The patch is marked as Waiting on Author in the CommitFest 
  application, but I'm not sure that's accurate. Can we try to nail this 
  down? 
 Here is my final version which embeds comments from Josh. I have also 
 added debug information to be printed in case '-d' is given.

FWIW I committed this last week, though I changed the debug message
wording slightly -- hope that's OK; it can be adjusted of course.

http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=b2e431a4db81a735d1474c4d1565a20b835878c9

-- 
Álvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Dry-run mode for pg_archivecleanup

2012-02-06 Thread Gabriele Bartolini

Ciao Alvaro,

Il 06/02/12 16:02, Alvaro Herrera ha scritto:

FWIW I committed this last week, though I changed the debug message
wording slightly -- hope that's OK; it can be adjusted of course.

http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=b2e431a4db81a735d1474c4d1565a20b835878c9



Beautiful! :)

Thank you very much.

Ciao,
Gabriele

--
 Gabriele Bartolini - 2ndQuadrant Italia
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
 gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it | www.2ndQuadrant.it


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Dry-run mode for pg_archivecleanup

2012-02-01 Thread Josh Kupershmidt
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Gabriele Bartolini
gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it wrote:

 Here is my final version which embeds comments from Josh. I have also added
 debug information to be printed in case '-d' is given.

Looks fine; will mark Ready For Committer.

Josh

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Dry-run mode for pg_archivecleanup

2012-01-31 Thread Gabriele Bartolini

Hi Robert,

sorry for the delay.

Il 27/01/12 15:47, Robert Haas ha scritto:
This email thread seems to have trailed off without reaching a 
conclusion. The patch is marked as Waiting on Author in the CommitFest 
application, but I'm not sure that's accurate. Can we try to nail this 
down? 
Here is my final version which embeds comments from Josh. I have also 
added debug information to be printed in case '-d' is given.


I will update the CommitFest website.

Thanks,
Gabriele

--
 Gabriele Bartolini - 2ndQuadrant Italia
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
 gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it | www.2ndQuadrant.it

*** a/contrib/pg_archivecleanup/pg_archivecleanup.c
--- b/contrib/pg_archivecleanup/pg_archivecleanup.c
***
*** 36,41  const char *progname;
--- 36,42 
  
  /* Options and defaults */
  bool  debug = false;  /* are we debugging? */
+ bool  dryrun = false; /* are we performing a dry-run 
operation? */
  
  char *archiveLocation;/* where to find the archive? */
  char *restartWALFileName; /* the file from which we can restart restore */
***
*** 119,124  CleanupPriorWALFiles(void)
--- 120,137 
{
snprintf(WALFilePath, MAXPGPATH, %s/%s,
 archiveLocation, xlde-d_name);
+ 
+   if (dryrun)
+   {
+   /* Prints the name of the file and
+* skips the actual removal of the file 
*/
+   fprintf(stdout, %s\n, WALFilePath);
+   if (debug)
+   fprintf(stderr, %s: dry-run 
mode suggests removing file \%s\\n,
+   progname, 
WALFilePath);
+   continue;
+   }
+ 
if (debug)
fprintf(stderr, %s: removing file 
\%s\\n,
progname, WALFilePath);
***
*** 205,210  usage(void)
--- 218,224 
printf(  %s [OPTION]... ARCHIVELOCATION OLDESTKEPTWALFILE\n, 
progname);
printf(\nOptions:\n);
printf(  -d generates debug output (verbose mode)\n);
+   printf(  -n shows the names of the files that would 
have been removed (dry-run)\n);
printf(  --help show this help, then exit\n);
printf(  --version  output version information, then exit\n);
printf(\n
***
*** 241,253  main(int argc, char **argv)
}
}
  
!   while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, d)) != -1)
{
switch (c)
{
case 'd':   /* Debug mode */
debug = true;
break;
default:
fprintf(stderr, Try \%s --help\ for more 
information.\n, progname);
exit(2);
--- 255,270 
}
}
  
!   while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, dn)) != -1)
{
switch (c)
{
case 'd':   /* Debug mode */
debug = true;
break;
+   case 'n':   /* Dry-Run mode */
+   dryrun = true;
+   break;
default:
fprintf(stderr, Try \%s --help\ for more 
information.\n, progname);
exit(2);
*** a/doc/src/sgml/pgarchivecleanup.sgml
--- b/doc/src/sgml/pgarchivecleanup.sgml
***
*** 98,103  pg_archivecleanup:  removing file 
archive/00010037000E
--- 98,112 
/listitem
   /varlistentry
  
+  varlistentry
+   termoption-n/option/term
+   listitem
+para
+ Print the names of the files that would have been removed on 
filenamestdout/ (performs a dry run).
+/para
+   /listitem
+  /varlistentry
+ 
  /variablelist
 /para
  

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Dry-run mode for pg_archivecleanup

2012-01-31 Thread Gabriele Bartolini

Hi Alvaro,

Il 27/01/12 23:55, Alvaro Herrera ha scritto:
If you do that, please make sure you use two complete separate strings 
instead of building one from spare parts. This bit is missing the _() 
stuff though. 
Currently pg_archivecleanup does not comply with localisation standards. 
I can put this in the todo list however. Let me know what you think.


Cheers,
Gabriele

--
 Gabriele Bartolini - 2ndQuadrant Italia
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
 gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it | www.2ndQuadrant.it


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Dry-run mode for pg_archivecleanup

2012-01-31 Thread Alvaro Herrera

Excerpts from Gabriele Bartolini's message of mar ene 31 12:31:58 -0300 2012:
 Hi Alvaro,
 
 Il 27/01/12 23:55, Alvaro Herrera ha scritto:
  If you do that, please make sure you use two complete separate strings 
  instead of building one from spare parts. This bit is missing the _() 
  stuff though. 
 Currently pg_archivecleanup does not comply with localisation standards. 
 I can put this in the todo list however. Let me know what you think.

Sorry, for some reason I thought this was pg_basebackup.  Programs in
contrib don't have localisation support, so it doesn't matter much.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Dry-run mode for pg_archivecleanup

2012-01-27 Thread Robert Haas
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Gabriele Bartolini
 gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it wrote:

 My actual intention was to have the filename as output of the command, in
 order to easily pipe it to another script. Hence my first choice was to
 use the stdout channel, considering also that pg_archivecleanup in dry-run
 mode is harmless and does not touch the content of the directory.

 Oh, right - I should have re-read your initial email before diving
 into the patch. That all makes sense given your intended purpose. I
 guess your goal of constructing some simple way to pass the files
 which would be removed on to another script is a little different than
 what I initially thought the patch would be useful for, namely as a
 testing/debugging aid for an admin.

 Perhaps both goals could be met by making use of '--debug' together
 with '--dry-run'. If they are both on, then an additional message like
 pg_archivecleanup: would remove file ...  would be printed to
 stderr, along with just the filename printed to stdout you already
 have.

This email thread seems to have trailed off without reaching a
conclusion.  The patch is marked as Waiting on Author in the
CommitFest application, but I'm not sure that's accurate.  Can we try
to nail this down?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Dry-run mode for pg_archivecleanup

2012-01-27 Thread Josh Kupershmidt
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Gabriele Bartolini
 gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it wrote:

 My actual intention was to have the filename as output of the command, in
 order to easily pipe it to another script. Hence my first choice was to
 use the stdout channel, considering also that pg_archivecleanup in dry-run
 mode is harmless and does not touch the content of the directory.

 Oh, right - I should have re-read your initial email before diving
 into the patch. That all makes sense given your intended purpose. I
 guess your goal of constructing some simple way to pass the files
 which would be removed on to another script is a little different than
 what I initially thought the patch would be useful for, namely as a
 testing/debugging aid for an admin.

 Perhaps both goals could be met by making use of '--debug' together
 with '--dry-run'. If they are both on, then an additional message like
 pg_archivecleanup: would remove file ...  would be printed to
 stderr, along with just the filename printed to stdout you already
 have.

 This email thread seems to have trailed off without reaching a
 conclusion.  The patch is marked as Waiting on Author in the
 CommitFest application, but I'm not sure that's accurate.  Can we try
 to nail this down?

Perhaps my last email was a bit wordy. The only real change I am
suggesting for Gabriele's patch is that the message printed to stderr
when debug + dryrun are activated be changed to would remove file
... from removing file, i.e around line 124:

if (debug)
fprintf(stderr, %s: %s file \%s\\n,
progname, (dryrun ? would remove : removing),
WALFilePath);

Other than that little quibble, I thought the patch was fine.

Josh

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Dry-run mode for pg_archivecleanup

2012-01-27 Thread Alvaro Herrera

Excerpts from Josh Kupershmidt's message of vie ene 27 19:43:51 -0300 2012:
 On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:

  This email thread seems to have trailed off without reaching a
  conclusion.  The patch is marked as Waiting on Author in the
  CommitFest application, but I'm not sure that's accurate.  Can we try
  to nail this down?
 
 Perhaps my last email was a bit wordy. The only real change I am
 suggesting for Gabriele's patch is that the message printed to stderr
 when debug + dryrun are activated be changed to would remove file
 ... from removing file, i.e around line 124:
 
 if (debug)
 fprintf(stderr, %s: %s file \%s\\n,
 progname, (dryrun ? would remove : removing),
 WALFilePath);
 
 Other than that little quibble, I thought the patch was fine.

If you do that, please make sure you use two complete separate strings
instead of building one from spare parts.  This bit is missing the _()
stuff though.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Dry-run mode for pg_archivecleanup

2012-01-15 Thread Gabriele Bartolini

Hi Josh,

Il 15/01/12 01:13, Josh Kupershmidt ha scritto:

I have signed on to review this patch for the 2012-01 CF. The patch
applies cleanly, includes the necessary documentation, and implements
a useful feature.

Thank you for dedicating your time to this matter.

I think the actual debugging line:

+   fprintf(stdout, %s\n, WALFilePath);
My actual intention was to have the filename as output of the command, 
in order to easily pipe it to another script. Hence my first choice 
was to use the stdout channel, considering also that pg_archivecleanup 
in dry-run mode is harmless and does not touch the content of the directory.

Oh, and I think the removing file...  debug message above should not
be printed in dryrun-mode, lest we confuse the admin.

Yes, I agree with you here.

Let me know what you think about my reasons for the stdout channel, then 
I will send v2.


Thanks again!

Ciao,
Gabriele

--
 Gabriele Bartolini - 2ndQuadrant Italia
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
 gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it | www.2ndQuadrant.it


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Dry-run mode for pg_archivecleanup

2012-01-15 Thread Josh Kupershmidt
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Gabriele Bartolini
gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it wrote:

 My actual intention was to have the filename as output of the command, in
 order to easily pipe it to another script. Hence my first choice was to
 use the stdout channel, considering also that pg_archivecleanup in dry-run
 mode is harmless and does not touch the content of the directory.

Oh, right - I should have re-read your initial email before diving
into the patch. That all makes sense given your intended purpose. I
guess your goal of constructing some simple way to pass the files
which would be removed on to another script is a little different than
what I initially thought the patch would be useful for, namely as a
testing/debugging aid for an admin.

Perhaps both goals could be met by making use of '--debug' together
with '--dry-run'. If they are both on, then an additional message like
pg_archivecleanup: would remove file ...  would be printed to
stderr, along with just the filename printed to stdout you already
have.

Josh

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Dry-run mode for pg_archivecleanup

2012-01-14 Thread Josh Kupershmidt
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Gabriele Bartolini
gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it wrote:
 Hi guys,

  I have added the '-n' option to pg_archivecleanup which performs a dry-run
 and outputs the names of the files to be removed to stdout (making possible
 to pass the list via pipe to another process).

  Please find attached the small patch. I submit it to the CommitFest.

Hi Gabriele,

I have signed on to review this patch for the 2012-01 CF. The patch
applies cleanly, includes the necessary documentation, and implements
a useful feature.

I think the actual debugging line:

+   fprintf(stdout, %s\n, WALFilePath);

might need to be tweaked. First, it's printing to stdout, and I think
pg_archivecleanup intentionally sends all its output to stderr, so
that it may show up in the postmaster log. (I expect the dry-run mode
would often be used to test out an archive_cleanup_command, instead of
only in stand-alone mode, where stdout would be fine.)

Also, I think the actual message should be something a little more
descriptive than just the WALFilePath. In debug mode,
pg_archivecleanup prints out a message like:

fprintf(stderr, %s: removing file \%s\\n,
progname, WALFilePath);

I think we'd want to print something similar, i.e. would remove file 

Oh, and I think the removing file...  debug message above should not
be printed in dryrun-mode, lest we confuse the admin.

Other than that, everything looks good.

Josh

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


[HACKERS] Dry-run mode for pg_archivecleanup

2011-12-11 Thread Gabriele Bartolini

Hi guys,

  I have added the '-n' option to pg_archivecleanup which performs a 
dry-run and outputs the names of the files to be removed to stdout 
(making possible to pass the list via pipe to another process).


  Please find attached the small patch. I submit it to the CommitFest.

Thanks,
Gabriele

--
  Gabriele Bartolini - 2ndQuadrant Italia
  PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
  gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it | www.2ndQuadrant.it


*** a/contrib/pg_archivecleanup/pg_archivecleanup.c
--- b/contrib/pg_archivecleanup/pg_archivecleanup.c
***
*** 36,41  const char *progname;
--- 36,42 
  
  /* Options and defaults */
  bool  debug = false;  /* are we debugging? */
+ bool  dryrun = false; /* are we performing a dry-run 
operation? */
  
  char *archiveLocation;/* where to find the archive? */
  char *restartWALFileName; /* the file from which we can restart restore */
***
*** 123,128  CleanupPriorWALFiles(void)
--- 124,136 
fprintf(stderr, %s: removing file 
\%s\\n,
progname, WALFilePath);
  
+   if (dryrun)
+   {
+   /* Prints the name of the file and
+* skips the actual removal of the file 
*/
+   fprintf(stdout, %s\n, WALFilePath);
+   continue;
+   }
rc = unlink(WALFilePath);
if (rc != 0)
{
***
*** 205,210  usage(void)
--- 213,219 
printf(  %s [OPTION]... ARCHIVELOCATION OLDESTKEPTWALFILE\n, 
progname);
printf(\nOptions:\n);
printf(  -d generates debug output (verbose mode)\n);
+   printf(  -n shows the names of the files that would 
have been removed (dry-run)\n);
printf(  --help show this help, then exit\n);
printf(  --version  output version information, then exit\n);
printf(\n
***
*** 241,253  main(int argc, char **argv)
}
}
  
!   while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, d)) != -1)
{
switch (c)
{
case 'd':   /* Debug mode */
debug = true;
break;
default:
fprintf(stderr, Try \%s --help\ for more 
information.\n, progname);
exit(2);
--- 250,265 
}
}
  
!   while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, dn)) != -1)
{
switch (c)
{
case 'd':   /* Debug mode */
debug = true;
break;
+   case 'n':   /* Dry-Run mode */
+   dryrun = true;
+   break;
default:
fprintf(stderr, Try \%s --help\ for more 
information.\n, progname);
exit(2);
*** a/doc/src/sgml/pgarchivecleanup.sgml
--- b/doc/src/sgml/pgarchivecleanup.sgml
***
*** 98,103  pg_archivecleanup:  removing file 
archive/00010037000E
--- 98,112 
/listitem
   /varlistentry
  
+  varlistentry
+   termoption-n/option/term
+   listitem
+para
+ Print the names of the files that would have been removed on 
filenamestdout/ (performs a dry run).
+/para
+   /listitem
+  /varlistentry
+ 
  /variablelist
 /para
  

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Dry-run mode for pg_archivecleanup

2011-12-11 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 15:52, Gabriele Bartolini
gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it wrote:
 Hi guys,

  I have added the '-n' option to pg_archivecleanup which performs a dry-run
 and outputs the names of the files to be removed to stdout (making possible
 to pass the list via pipe to another process).

  Please find attached the small patch. I submit it to the CommitFest.

Sounds like a useful feature. But you added it to the wrong commitfest
;) I've moved it to the proper one (2012-01).


-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Dry Run mode for pg_archivecleanup

2011-06-29 Thread Fujii Masao
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Gabriele Bartolini
gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it wrote:
   I have added the '-n' option to pg_archivecleanup which performs a dry-run
 and outputs the names of the files to be removed to stdout (making possible
 to pass the list via pipe to another process). Please find attached the
 small patch.

Please add the patch into the next CommitFest.
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=11

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


[HACKERS] Dry Run mode for pg_archivecleanup

2011-06-27 Thread Gabriele Bartolini

Hi guys,

   I have added the '-n' option to pg_archivecleanup which performs a 
dry-run and outputs the names of the files to be removed to stdout 
(making possible to pass the list via pipe to another process). Please 
find attached the small patch.


Thanks,
Gabriele

--
 Gabriele Bartolini - 2ndQuadrant Italia
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
 gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it | www.2ndQuadrant.it

From 25fcf05ff787dae2b0d62de423a363f8597f1d42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gabriele Bartolini gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:27:09 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add dryrun option to pg_archivecleanup

---
 contrib/pg_archivecleanup/pg_archivecleanup.c |   13 -
 doc/src/sgml/pgarchivecleanup.sgml|9 +
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/contrib/pg_archivecleanup/pg_archivecleanup.c 
b/contrib/pg_archivecleanup/pg_archivecleanup.c
index dd8a451..0bbec92 100644
--- a/contrib/pg_archivecleanup/pg_archivecleanup.c
+++ b/contrib/pg_archivecleanup/pg_archivecleanup.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ const char *progname;
 
 /* Options and defaults */
 bool   debug = false;  /* are we debugging? */
+bool   dryrun = false; /* are we performing a dry-run 
operation? */
 
 char  *archiveLocation;/* where to find the archive? */
 char  *restartWALFileName; /* the file from which we can restart restore */
@@ -123,6 +124,12 @@ CleanupPriorWALFiles(void)
fprintf(stderr, %s: removing file 
\%s\\n,
progname, WALFilePath);
 
+   if (dryrun) {
+   /* Prints the name of the file and
+* skips the actual removal of the file 
*/
+   fprintf(stdout, %s\n, WALFilePath);
+   continue;
+   }
rc = unlink(WALFilePath);
if (rc != 0)
{
@@ -205,6 +212,7 @@ usage(void)
printf(  %s [OPTION]... ARCHIVELOCATION OLDESTKEPTWALFILE\n, 
progname);
printf(\nOptions:\n);
printf(  -d generates debug output (verbose mode)\n);
+   printf(  -n shows the names of the files that would 
have been removed (dry-run)\n);
printf(  --help show this help, then exit\n);
printf(  --version  output version information, then exit\n);
printf(\n
@@ -241,13 +249,16 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
}
}
 
-   while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, d)) != -1)
+   while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, dn)) != -1)
{
switch (c)
{
case 'd':   /* Debug mode */
debug = true;
break;
+   case 'n':   /* Dry-Run mode */
+   dryrun = true;
+   break;
default:
fprintf(stderr, Try \%s --help\ for more 
information.\n, progname);
exit(2);
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/pgarchivecleanup.sgml 
b/doc/src/sgml/pgarchivecleanup.sgml
index ddffa32..8148c53 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/pgarchivecleanup.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/pgarchivecleanup.sgml
@@ -98,6 +98,15 @@ pg_archivecleanup:  removing file 
archive/00010037000E
   /listitem
  /varlistentry
 
+ varlistentry
+  termoption-n/option/term
+  listitem
+   para
+Print the names of the files that would have been removed on 
filenamestdout/ (performs a dry run).
+   /para
+  /listitem
+ /varlistentry
+
 /variablelist
/para
 
-- 
1.7.4.1


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers