On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 02:36:21PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
[Various ECPG connection string problems.]
Fixed.
Are any of these changes considered bug fixes that will be backpatched,
or should I prepare different documentation patches for different
versions? With the recent talk about
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 10:00:42PM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
1. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:port]
Fixed.
2. tcp:postgresql://hostname[:port][/dbname][?options]
This suggests that tcp:postgresql://hostname[:port] should work
without specifying /dbname, and indeed it does work when the
Fixed.
3.
ECPG has several discrepancies between the documented connection
target formats and actual behavior. I'm preparing a documentation
patch as I previously mentioned in the recent Connection string
thread in pgsql-general, but before doing so I'd like to distinguish
documentation bugs from code
