On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 19:26, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 19:22, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander writes:
>>> Since I brought it up - a patch along this line?
>>
>> Please don't capitalize "foreign table" there.
>
> Yeah, I was a bit split about that myself. Will change.
>
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 19:22, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander writes:
>> Since I brought it up - a patch along this line?
>
> Please don't capitalize "foreign table" there.
Yeah, I was a bit split about that myself. Will change.
> Also, I think an "else" before the other ereport would make t
Magnus Hagander writes:
> Since I brought it up - a patch along this line?
Please don't capitalize "foreign table" there.
Also, I think an "else" before the other ereport would make the code
clearer, even though it's not strictly necessary.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent vi
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 16:19, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Page writes:
>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Susanne Ebrecht
>> wrote:
>>> When we make such a hint for foreign tables then we should make a similar
>>> hint for views.
>
>> A view really isn't a table, unlike a foreign table, so I don't t
Dave Page writes:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Susanne Ebrecht
> wrote:
>> When we make such a hint for foreign tables then we should make a similar
>> hint for views.
> A view really isn't a table, unlike a foreign table, so I don't think
> that argument holds.
Well, from the implementat
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 10:42:30AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Susanne Ebrecht
> wrote:
> > On 03.05.2011 09:30, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>
> >> Well, yeah, but I don't think we can squeeze that into 9.1 without
> >> Robert noticing :P
> >>
> >> Any suggestions on *
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Susanne Ebrecht
wrote:
> On 03.05.2011 09:30, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>> Well, yeah, but I don't think we can squeeze that into 9.1 without
>> Robert noticing :P
>>
>> Any suggestions on *what* the hint should be? Just something along the
>> line "indexes cannot
On 03.05.2011 09:30, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Well, yeah, but I don't think we can squeeze that into 9.1 without
Robert noticing :P
Any suggestions on *what* the hint should be? Just something along the
line "indexes cannot be created on foreign tables"?
Magnus,
I am not really sure if this is
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 23:56, David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:27:08PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> postgres=# DROP TABLE FOO;
>> ERROR: "foo" is not a table
>> HINT: Use DROP FOREIGN TABLE to remove a foreign table.
>> postgres=# CREATE INDEX baz ON foo(bar);
>> ERROR: "foo
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:27:08PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> postgres=# DROP TABLE FOO;
> ERROR: "foo" is not a table
> HINT: Use DROP FOREIGN TABLE to remove a foreign table.
> postgres=# CREATE INDEX baz ON foo(bar);
> ERROR: "foo" is not a table
>
> To some, that would be confusing - f
postgres=# DROP TABLE FOO;
ERROR: "foo" is not a table
HINT: Use DROP FOREIGN TABLE to remove a foreign table.
postgres=# CREATE INDEX baz ON foo(bar);
ERROR: "foo" is not a table
To some, that would be confusing - foo kind of is a table, just a
different kind. Should we have some HINT on that
11 matches
Mail list logo
