On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
>> So is somebody from 2nd Quadrant going to supply a patch to fix this?
>
> I'm already on it. The whole patch appears to need some review,
> considering this is about the fourth major flaw we've found in it.
I'll leave
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Excerpts from Simon Riggs's message of mié jun 15 16:31:45 -0400 2011:
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> wrote:
>>
>> > So is somebody from 2nd Quadrant going to supply a patch to fix this?
>>
>> My understanding was tha
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> So is somebody from 2nd Quadrant going to supply a patch to fix this?
I'm already on it. The whole patch appears to need some review,
considering this is about the fourth major flaw we've found in it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Simon Riggs's message of mié jun 15 16:31:45 -0400 2011:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> wrote:
>
> > So is somebody from 2nd Quadrant going to supply a patch to fix this?
>
> My understanding was that your patch had a bug, rather than the
> existing code. If I
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> So is somebody from 2nd Quadrant going to supply a patch to fix this?
My understanding was that your patch had a bug, rather than the
existing code. If I misunderstood, please explain the bug.
In terms of "2ndQuadrant" supplying patches,
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
>
> So is somebody from 2nd Quadrant going to supply a patch to fix this?
>
well, i was going to give it a try... but in a couple of hours...
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié jun 15 11:54:25 -0400 2011:
> Dean Rasheed writes:
> > On 15 June 2011 07:56, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> >> Testing the CHECK NOT VALID patch i found $subject... is this intended?
>
> > Aside from the ugliness of the code, we can't just add a
> > ConstraintAt
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dean Rasheed writes:
>> On 15 June 2011 07:56, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>>> Testing the CHECK NOT VALID patch i found $subject... is this intended?
>
>> Aside from the ugliness of the code, we can't just add a
>> ConstraintAttributeSpec to the seco
Dean Rasheed writes:
> On 15 June 2011 07:56, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> Testing the CHECK NOT VALID patch i found $subject... is this intended?
> Aside from the ugliness of the code, we can't just add a
> ConstraintAttributeSpec to the second block, because that would
> enforce an order to these
On 15 June 2011 07:56, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Testing the CHECK NOT VALID patch i found $subject... is this intended?
>
I just noticed that too, and was about to raise it as a bug.
If it is intended, then it's not documented.
I noticed it while browsing gram.y, and thought it looks a b
Hi,
Testing the CHECK NOT VALID patch i found $subject... is this intended?
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.
11 matches
Mail list logo