I wrote:
> The release team discussed this a couple weeks ago, but I don't
> think anybody mentioned it on -hackers: v10 seems to be in good
> enough shape that it's okay to make the REL_10_STABLE branch soon,
> and open HEAD for v11 development.
> Last year we branched on Aug 15, and we should be
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> The release team discussed this a couple weeks ago, but I don't
> think anybody mentioned it on -hackers: v10 seems to be in good
> enough shape that it's okay to make the REL_10_STABLE branch soon,
> and open HEAD for v11 development.
>
> Last yea
The release team discussed this a couple weeks ago, but I don't
think anybody mentioned it on -hackers: v10 seems to be in good
enough shape that it's okay to make the REL_10_STABLE branch soon,
and open HEAD for v11 development.
Last year we branched on Aug 15, and we should be able to keep
to th