Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
That's exactly what pg_basebackup does. Once you move into more
complicated scenarios with multiple standbys and WAL archiving,
it's inevitably going to be more complicated to set up.
That doesn't mean that we can't make it
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 20:26, Joshua Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Magnus, all:
It seems a bit annoying to have to do an rm -rf * $PGDATA/ before resynching
a standby using pg_basebackup. This means that I still need to wrap
basebackup in a shell script, instead of having it do
Magnus,
That could certainly be useful, yes. But I have a feeling whomever
tries to get that into 9.1 will be killed - but it's certainly good to
put ont he list of things for 9.2.
Oh, no question. At some point in 9.2 we should also discuss how basebackup
considers emtpy directories.
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Joshua Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
It seems a bit annoying to have to do an rm -rf * $PGDATA/ before resynching
a standby using pg_basebackup. This means that I still need to wrap
basebackup in a shell script, instead of having it do everything for me ...
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Joshua Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Couldn't we have a --force option which would clear all data and tablespace
directories before resynching?
What would be even more useful us some kind of support for
differential
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Joshua Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Couldn't we have a --force option which would clear all data and tablespace
directories before resynching?
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not integrated and I doubt it's conveniently available on Windows.
One of the biggest problems with our replication functionality right
now is that it's hard to set up. We've actually done a good job
making the
On 10.04.2011 20:06, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Admittedly, the above is a slightly different problem, but I think it
all points in the direction of needing more automation and more ease
of use.
And let me also note that the
Magnus, all:
It seems a bit annoying to have to do an rm -rf * $PGDATA/ before resynching a
standby using pg_basebackup. This means that I still need to wrap basebackup
in a shell script, instead of having it do everything for me ... especially if
I have multiple tablespaces.
Couldn't we
