Re: [HACKERS] Function definition removed but prototype still there

2014-01-28 Thread Bruce Momjian 
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 09:42:37AM +, Rajeev rastogi wrote:
> As part of the below commit
> 
>  
> 
> 36a35c550ac114caa423bcbe339d3515db0cd957 (Compress GIN posting
> lists, for smaller index size.)
> 
>  
> 
> Function GinDataPageAddItemPointer definition was removed but corresponding
> prototype was still there.
> 
>  
> 
> Attached is the patch to fix the same.

Thanks.  Applied.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

[HACKERS] Function definition removed but prototype still there

2014-01-28 Thread Rajeev rastogi 
As part of the below commit

36a35c550ac114caa423bcbe339d3515db0cd957 (Compress GIN posting 
lists, for smaller index size.)

Function GinDataPageAddItemPointer definition was removed but corresponding 
prototype was still there.

Attached is the patch to fix the same.

Thanks and Regards,
Kumar Rajeev Rastogi



unwanted_prototype.patch
Description: unwanted_prototype.patch

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers