In connection with the relation-mapping patch I proposed a function
pg_relation_filenode(regclass) returns oid
which client code would need to use instead of looking at
pg_class.relfilenode, if it wants to get a number that will be
meaningful for mapped system catalogs. I still think we
On Feb 7, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
In connection with the relation-mapping patch I proposed a function
pg_relation_filenode(regclass) returns oid
which client code would need to use instead of looking at
pg_class.relfilenode, if it wants to get a number that will be
David Christensen da...@endpoint.com writes:
On Feb 7, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
pg_relation_filepath(regclass) returns text
which would expose the output of relpath(), ie, the $PGDATA-relative
path name of the relation.
Should this return multiple values (text[] or SETOF text) for
On Feb 7, 2010, at 1:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
David Christensen da...@endpoint.com writes:
On Feb 7, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
pg_relation_filepath(regclass) returns text
which would expose the output of relpath(), ie, the $PGDATA-relative
path name of the relation.
Should this
